RDT&E Project · President's Budget PB2027

Equipment Modernization

Project 676013·PE 0207457F — Air Force Special Warfare (SPECWAR)·U.S. Air Force·BA7
FY2027 Request
$12.5M
▲ 7.6% vs FY2026
HitchAI read

Project 676013 — Equipment Modernization requests $12.5M in FY2027, 51% of the $24.4M requested for program element 0207457F, up 7.6% on FY2026. 1 R-2A activity decomposes the request. General Dynamics is the largest named R-3 performer at $10.6M, 85% of the project's FY2027 R-3 total.

FY2027 Request
$12.5M
▲ 7.6% vs FY2026
FY2026 Enacted
$11.7M
No FY2025 funding
FY2025 Actual
$0.0M
Prior year
Project detail

What project 676013 buys

Air Force Special Warfare (AFSPECWAR) Tactical Air Control Party (TACP) Weapon System executes precision strike, integration, and all-domain command and control missions to meet Air Force power projection for the joint force's expanded maneuver. They do this by providing joint force air component commanders with a highly trained force that operates at the tactical edge in highly contested environments and complicates enemy decision-making processes. TACP Airmen plan, request, advise, and control joint fires and air power to meet multinational operations and supported Combatant commander's objectives. The purpose of Tactical Air Control Party - Modernization (TACP-M) programs are to provide TACPs with modernized voice, data, and video communications, including diverse waveforms and software, advanced targeting equipment, and enhanced battlefield awareness/management capabilities across all domains. Improved targeting and data communications capabilities improve kill chain timelines, defeat adversary systems through opening and closing kill webs, extended critical networks to the forward edge, and when required reduce the probability of fratricide or collateral damage. TACP-M programs address frequent TACP combat deployments that sometimes lead users to change equipment procurement requirements to support urgent operational needs and respond to evolving threat environments. TACP-M programs jointly develop and procure software, hardware and test assets with other AFSPECWAR programs to consolidate requirements that are common across the AFSPECWAR enterprise. This teaming arrangement helps standardize equipment, improve efficiency by consolidating acquisition efforts, enabling a common baseline, and reducing overall costs.

R-3 lines of work
  • Product Development
  • Test and Evaluation
  • Management Services
Funding trajectory

Project 676013 funding, FY2025–FY2031

Prior years are actuals, the budget year is the request, and the outyears are the FYDP plan. Estimate types are colored and never summed into one figure. Projects carry the full five-year plan; the activities inside them stop at the budget year.

00.0FY25ACTUAL11.7FY26ENACTED12.5FY27REQUEST6.0FY284.1FY291.3FY301.5FY31
Actual Enacted Request Outyear (FYDP)
Fiscal YearEstimate TypeAmount ($M)
FY2025Actual0.0
FY2026Enacted11.7
FY2027Request12.5
FY2028Outyear6.0
FY2029Outyear4.1
FY2030Outyear1.3
FY2031Outyear1.5
Inside the project

1 accomplishment / planned program

The R-2A exhibit — the only level of the budget that describes work that has not happened yet. Activities carry the prior, current and budget year only, no five-year plan. Each describes FY2027 work in enough detail to have its own page; the rest are shown here in full. Coverage is partial across the corpus, so count activities, never total them.

FY2025 actual$0.0M
FY2026 enacted$11.7M
FY2027 request$12.5M

-Will continue agile software development with at least quarterly software releases across TACP systems -Will continue testing software releases, as applicable -Will continue to support development/fielding of Joint Personal Edge Computing Device - Tactical Android (JPECD-TA)/Tactical Assault Kit (TAK) and other Dismounted Special…

Read the FY2027 plan →
Who's building it

Named performers on project 676013

Performers named in the R-3 exhibit under this project. Share is of the project's whole FY2027 R-3 total — the same denominator the program-element split uses, so the two read on one scale and will not sum to 100% when unnamed or government work is in the mix. Budget-justification contract funding, not obligations.

General Dynamics
$10.6M · 85%