RDT&E Program Element · President's Budget PB2027

Advanced Research

PE 0603180C·Defense-Wide·Approp. 0400 — RDT&E·BA3 — Advanced Technology Development
FY2027 Request
$482.6M
⚑ Contested — House approps cuts 18%
HitchAI read

Defense-Wide funding ramps 530% to a $482.6M request in FY2027, sustained across the five-year plan. In the FY2027 defense authorization, the House added 13% (to $545.6M); the Senate added 5.2% (to $507.6M); House appropriators cut 18% (to $393.8M).

FY2027 Request
$482.6M
▲ 530% vs FY2026
House approps mark
$393.8M
▼ $88.8M vs request
FY2026 Enacted
$76.6M
In law

Roll-up of 3 projects. Projects are the summable leaves — the PE total is their sum, never added to it.

For fiscal year 2027, Defense-Wide agencies are requesting $482.6M for Advanced Research under RDT&E program element 0603180C, up 530% over FY2026. In the FY2027 defense authorization, House approps moved to cut it to $393.8M.

Funding trajectory

Funding profile, FY2025–FY2031

Prior years are actuals, the budget year is the request, and the outyears are the FYDP plan. Estimate types are colored and never summed into one figure.

2505007501,000050.2FY25ACTUAL76.6FY26ENACTED482.6FY27REQUEST960.3FY281,057.0FY29770.9FY30933.2FY31HOUSE APPROPS
Actual Enacted Request Outyear (FYDP) House approps mark
Fiscal YearEstimate TypeAmount ($M)
FY2025Actual50.2
FY2026Enacted76.6
FY2027Request482.6
FY2028Outyear960.3
FY2029Outyear1,057.0
FY2030Outyear770.9
FY2031Outyear933.2
Where it sits

Acquisition lifecycle

This program is funded in RDT&E Budget Activity 3 — Advanced Technology Development.

Complete
Research
BA 1–2
Current
Advanced Technology
BA 3
Later
Prototyping
BA 4
Later
Development & Fielding
BA 5–7
Inside the program element

3 projects roll up into PE 0603180C

Projects are the summable leaves — the PE total is their sum, never added to it. Program elements and projects carry the full five-year plan; activities stop at the budget year. This PE moves 530% overall, which can hide much larger swings below.

Congressional action

The request is contested

Committee marks on the FY2027 request. Adds and cuts are reconciled in conference before they become law.

RequestPresident's Budget
$482.6M
House NDAA (HASC)HASC
$545.6M +$63.0M · +13%
Senate NDAA (SASC)SASC
$507.6M +$25.0M · +5.2%
House Approps (HAC-D)HAC_D
$393.8M −$88.8M · −18%
▲ $151.8M chamber gap — unresolved as of 2026-07-27. These are FY2027 authorization marks (NDAA); appropriations and the conference agreement may differ.
Program detail

Mission & acquisition strategy

The threat is evolving and becoming more complex, which introduces new challenges for missile defense. Some of these complex challenges include the volume of threats, system performance in raids, latency across the kill chain, communication between disparate systems, performance in a contested environment and cybersecurity of networks/systems. These challenges to missile defense require more disruptive capabilities like the following: - Kinetic & hypersonic defense in the areas of advanced sensing and low-cost systems. - Non-kinetics and electronic warfare. - Next generation command, control & integration. - Disruptive technology and space demonstrations.

Project MD25, MD40, MC25 — Advanced Technology Development
Ask Hitch

Ask this program element

Answers are generated from the figures on this page — the FY2027 justification exhibits and the marks tracked above — and nothing else is consulted. Confirm any figure against the cited exhibit before you use it externally.

H
Questions this page can answer
How does the FY2027 request compare with FY2026, and what does the five-year plan show?What did House approps do to this request, and what is still unresolved?Which project inside PE 0603180C is growing fastest, and which is shrinking?In plain terms, what is this program element for and how is it being acquired?

This page carries the budget justification and the NDAA marks — nothing else. For what a contractor has actually been obligated, the ledger is at hitchintel.com/vendors; for live solicitations, hitchintel.com/opportunities. Both are member surfaces.

Provenance

Cite this page

Sources
FY2027 Office of the Secretary of Defense RDT&E Budget Justification · Exhibits R-2 / R-3 · PE 0603180C (President's Budget PB2027) — and FY2027 NDAA committee marks, as tracked 2026-07-27.
Suggested citation
HitchAI, "Advanced Research (PE 0603180C)," federal budget intelligence, PB2027 vintage. hitchintel.com/programs/0603180C
Machine access
Markdown twin /programs/0603180C.md · MCP mcp.hitchintel.combudget_get_program_element, budget_get_cong_marks
FY2027 Request
$460.2M
▲ 512% vs FY2026
FY2026 Enacted
$75.2M
▲ 52% vs FY2025
FY2025 Actual
$49.5M
Prior year

Advanced Technology Development — one RDT&E project inside PE 0603180C. Congressional marks are recorded on the program element, not on a project.

Project MD25 — Advanced Technology Development — requests $460.2M in FY2027, 95% of the $482.6M requested for program element 0603180C. Year over year it grows 512% against FY2026.

Funding trajectory

Project MD25 funding, FY2025–FY2031

Prior years are actuals, the budget year is the request, and the outyears are the FYDP plan. Estimate types are colored and never summed into one figure. Projects carry the full five-year plan; the activities inside them stop at the budget year.

2505007501,000049.5FY25ACTUAL75.2FY26ENACTED460.2FY27REQUEST926.6FY281,015.4FY29736.6FY30890.8FY31
Actual Enacted Request Outyear (FYDP)
Fiscal YearEstimate TypeAmount ($M)
FY2025Actual49.5
FY2026Enacted75.2
FY2027Request460.2
FY2028Outyear926.6
FY2029Outyear1,015.4
FY2030Outyear736.6
FY2031Outyear890.8
Inside the project

1 accomplishment / planned program

The R-2A exhibit. Activities carry the prior, current and budget year only — no five-year plan — and they are descriptive: coverage is partial and they do not always add back to the project, so count them, never total them. Opening lines only here — the full year-by-year narrative is on the project page.

FY2025 actual$49.5M
FY2026 enacted$75.2M
FY2027 request$460.2M

Planned efforts in support of advancing disruptive capabilities to include, but not limited to: National Integrated Air and Missile Defense (IAMD) Center (NIC): - Distribute integrated multi-domain, multi-service live, virtual and constructive system into a hybrid physical and virtual platform using a phased approach to field NIC initial…

Read the FY2027 plan →
Project MD25 — every activity in full →
Project detail

What project MD25 buys

The threat is evolving and becoming more complex, which introduces new challenges for missile defense. Some of these complex challenges include the volume of threats, system performance in raids, latency across the kill chain, communication between disparate systems, performance in a contested environment and cybersecurity of networks/systems. These challenges to missile defense require more disruptive capabilities like the following: - Kinetic & hypersonic defense in the areas of advanced sensing and low-cost systems. - Non-kinetics and electronic warfare. - Next generation command, control & integration. - Disruptive technology and space demonstrations. - NIC. - Cyber Protection / Information Assurance. The Missile Defense Agency (MDA) Advanced Capability Office provides enhancements to the missile defense system by focusing on accelerated delivery of disruptive capabilities to the warfighter by pursuing rapid prototypes and demonstrations with incremental capability deliveries. The activities utilize two/three-year technology sprints and lean project teams to support rapid development and transition to the Warfighter for evolving regional and homeland missile threats. The funds requested in this PE provide both legacy and Global Missile Defense Capability development for the United States, its deployed forces, allies, and partners. The capabilities funded by this budget request are complementary to the architecture funded by the Golden Dome Program's separate budget request and together fulfill the President's Executive Order 14186. The President's January 27, 2025, Executive Order established a goal of protecting the U.S. citizens, safeguarding critical infrastructure, and securing second-strike capability against missile attack from any adversary. This program and budget in addition to the budget requested by the Golden Dome Program Office reflects the changes necessary to protect the U.S. against ballistic, hypersonic, cruise, and other advanced missile threats.

FY2027 Request
$18.3M
▲ 1157% vs FY2026
FY2026 Enacted
$1.5M
▲ 95% vs FY2025
FY2025 Actual
$0.7M
Prior year

Program-Wide Support — one RDT&E project inside PE 0603180C. Congressional marks are recorded on the program element, not on a project.

Project MD40 — Program-Wide Support — requests $18.3M in FY2027, 3.8% of the $482.6M requested for program element 0603180C. Year over year it grows 1157% against FY2026.

Funding trajectory

Project MD40 funding, FY2025–FY2031

Prior years are actuals, the budget year is the request, and the outyears are the FYDP plan. Estimate types are colored and never summed into one figure. Projects carry the full five-year plan; the activities inside them stop at the budget year.

2500.7FY25ACTUAL1.5FY26ENACTED18.3FY27REQUEST29.6FY2837.3FY2930.0FY3038.2FY31
Actual Enacted Request Outyear (FYDP)
Fiscal YearEstimate TypeAmount ($M)
FY2025Actual0.7
FY2026Enacted1.5
FY2027Request18.3
FY2028Outyear29.6
FY2029Outyear37.3
FY2030Outyear30.0
FY2031Outyear38.2
Inside the project

1 accomplishment / planned program

The R-2A exhibit. Activities carry the prior, current and budget year only — no five-year plan — and they are descriptive: coverage is partial and they do not always add back to the project, so count them, never total them. Opening lines only here — the full year-by-year narrative is on the project page.

Program Wide Support▲ 1157%
FY2025 actual$0.7M
FY2026 enacted$1.5M
FY2027 request$18.3M

- Increase from FY 2026 to FY 2027 provides for transfer of funds from PE 0603176C to PE 0603180C.

Project MD40 — every activity in full →
Project detail

What project MD40 buys

PWS contains non-headquarters management costs in support of Missile Defense Agency (MDA) functions and activities across the entire Missile Defense System. These functions include Government Civilians and Contract Support Services. This effort provides integrity and oversight of the Missile Defense System as well as supports MDA in the development and evaluation of technologies that will respond to the changing threat. Additionally, PWS includes personnel to support global deployments, performing deployment site preparation and activation, and provides facility capabilities for MDA Executing Agent locations worldwide. Other MDA wide costs include: physical and technical security; civilian drug testing; audit readiness; the Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) program; legal services and settlements; travel and agency training; office equipment, vehicle, and warehouse leases; utilities and base operations across multiple geographic locations; commercial and ancillary facility services; management of all facility aspects regardless of lifecycle stage; supplies and maintenance; compliance with statutory environmental requirements; data and unified communications support; materiel and readiness and central property management of equipment; Facilities Sustainment, Restoration and Modernization (FSRM) program (formerly Real Property Maintenance) to keep the Department's inventory of facilities in good working order; and similar operating expenses. PWS is allocated on a pro-rata basis across most Agency PEs and therefore fluctuates per PE by FY based on the total Agency budget in that FY.

FY2027 Request
$4.1M
No FY2026 funding
FY2026 Enacted
$0.0M
No FY2025 funding
FY2025 Actual
$0.0M
Prior year

Cyber Operations — one RDT&E project inside PE 0603180C. Congressional marks are recorded on the program element, not on a project.

Project MC25 — Cyber Operations — requests $4.1M in FY2027, 0.8% of the $482.6M requested for program element 0603180C. It is a new start — no prior-year or current-year money.

Funding trajectory

Project MC25 funding, FY2025–FY2031

Prior years are actuals, the budget year is the request, and the outyears are the FYDP plan. Estimate types are colored and never summed into one figure. Projects carry the full five-year plan; the activities inside them stop at the budget year.

00.0FY25ACTUAL0.0FY26ENACTED4.1FY27REQUEST4.1FY284.2FY294.2FY304.2FY31
Actual Enacted Request Outyear (FYDP)
Fiscal YearEstimate TypeAmount ($M)
FY2025Actual0.0
FY2026Enacted0.0
FY2027Request4.1
FY2028Outyear4.1
FY2029Outyear4.2
FY2030Outyear4.2
FY2031Outyear4.2
Inside the project

2 accomplishments / planned programs

The R-2A exhibit. Activities carry the prior, current and budget year only — no five-year plan — and they are descriptive: coverage is partial and they do not always add back to the project, so count them, never total them.

Information Assurance / Cyber Network DefenseNEW
FY2025 actual$0.0M
FY2026 enacted$0.0M
FY2027 request$2.0M

FY2027 planned work - Begin project office-specific mission related information technology efforts.

FY2026 to FY2027 change Increase from FY 2026 to FY 2027 provides the continuation of efforts previously conducted within PE 0603176C, MC71 Cyber Operations. These efforts continue to provide information assurance and cyber network defense.

FY2026 plans — current year - No funding is requested in FY 2026.

Detect, Analyze and Mitigate IntrusionsNEW
FY2025 actual$0.0M
FY2026 enacted$0.0M
FY2027 request$2.1M

FY2026 to FY2027 change Increase from FY 2026 to FY 2027 provides for consolidation of enterprise IT requirements and realignment of cybersecurity requirements to new Office of Management and Budget Cybersecurity Taxonomy.

Project detail

What project MC25 buys

This Cyber operations project supports both the security and effective execution of program office mission-related activities. Cybersecurity efforts include monitoring and tracking mitigations as required by Department of Defense Instruction Number 8510.01, as amended, or other applicable Department of War (DoW) cybersecurity guidance, establishing Risk Management Framework (RMF) requirements for DoW Information Technology (IT). Funds implement and sustain DoW-required RMF, associated Controls Validation Testing, and hardware/software upgrades to meet DoW standards. Activities include analysis of validation results, risk assessments, and reviews of Program Manager/Information Assurance System Security Manager Plans of Action and Milestones (POAMs) for enabling modeling and simulation mission systems. RMF documentation (artifacts, validation and Information Assurance (IA) risk assessment results, and Missile Defense Agency (MDA) Authorizing Official and Chief Information Officer accreditation decisions) are captured in the Defense Information Systems Agency's Enterprise Mission Assurance Support Service system. Independent verification and validation team actions ensure the availability, integrity, authentication, confidentiality, and non-repudiation of MDA mission, test, and administrative systems, in compliance with the Federal Information Security Management Act. Essential enterprise and end-user support required to execute program office-specific mission-related activities include activities for systems supporting end user, unified communications (wireless services), business automation, portal and data services, networks and infrastructure, Video Teleconferencing services, connectivity to industry and other government agency partners, and Joint Worldwide Intelligence Communications System. These support services are critical for minimizing downtime, maximizing user productivity, and sustaining Service Level Agreement requirements.