What project MT08 buys
Missile Defense Midcourse Defense Segment Test provides flight, ground, and cyber testing of hardware and software to demonstrate an integrated capability to counter the allocated threats. The hardware and software are tested in an integrated environment with Missile Defense System Sensors; Command and Control, Battle Management, and Communications; United States Northern Command (USNORTHCOM) Warfighters; and national collection assets to assess and demonstrate the ability to defend the United States Homeland. Primary activities include planning, design, and execution of flight tests, ground tests, cyber tests; test resources; and program operations. Flight tests provide the opportunity to test actual hardware and software and to demonstrate Missile Defense System interoperability under operationally realistic conditions. Ground-Based Midcourse Defense Program participates in integrated Missile Defense System ground tests executed in both the Hardware-in-the-Loop (HWIL) lab environment and with deployed operational assets providing integrated performance data supporting hardware and software fielding decisions. The Ground-Based Midcourse Defense Program conducts cyber tests and participates in integrated Missile Defense System level cyber tests executed both in the HWIL lab environment and using operational assets providing performance data supporting cyber, operational resilience, and system survivability assessments. Test resources provide the infrastructure and laboratories to support the Ground Missile Defense (GMD) test program as well as day-to-day operations of the GMD test program to include support for test planning, execution, and post-event reconstruction. Program operations provide for technical and business management support of the test program.
- Support
- Test and Evaluation
- Management Services
Project MT08 funding, FY2025–FY2031
Prior years are actuals, the budget year is the request, and the outyears are the FYDP plan. Estimate types are colored and never summed into one figure. Projects carry the full five-year plan; the activities inside them stop at the budget year.
| Fiscal Year | Estimate Type | Amount ($M) |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | Actual | 38.2 |
| FY2026 | Enacted | 36.7 |
| FY2027 | Request | 51.9 |
| FY2028 | Outyear | 87.5 |
| FY2029 | Outyear | 87.0 |
| FY2030 | Outyear | 208.6 |
| FY2031 | Outyear | 54.2 |
3 accomplishments / planned programs
The R-2A exhibit — the only level of the budget that describes work that has not happened yet. Activities carry the prior, current and budget year only, no five-year plan. 1 of them describes FY2027 work in enough detail to have its own page; the rest are shown here in full. Coverage is partial across the corpus, so count activities, never total them.
FY2026 to FY2027 change Increase from Fiscal Year (FY) 2026 to FY 2027 is in accordance with the Integrated Master Test Plan requirements. The Missile Defense System Test Program realigned the Missile Defense Agency's (MDA) Flight Test Budget from Program Element (PE) Ballistic Missile Defense Test 0603914C to PE Ballistic Missile Defense Midcourse Defense Segment Test 0604887C.
- Continue laboratory test infrastructure planning to integrate and test the upgraded Ground-Based Midcourse Defense Program hardware and software in support of flight, ground, and cyber testing. - Continue testing infrastructure and coordination for flight test range support from VSFB for future flight testing. - Continue testing…
Read the FY2027 plan →FY2026 to FY2027 change Increase from Fiscal Year (FY) 2026 to FY 2027 is in accordance with the Integrated Master Test Plan requirements. The Missile Defense System Test Program realigned the Missile Defense Agency's (MDA) Flight Test Budget from Program Element (PE) Ballistic Missile Defense Test 0603914C to PE Ballistic Missile Defense Midcourse Defense Segment Test 0604887C.
Named performers on project MT08
Performers named in the R-3 exhibit under this project. Share is of the project's whole FY2027 R-3 total — the same denominator the program-element split uses, so the two read on one scale and will not sum to 100% when unnamed or government work is in the mix. Budget-justification contract funding, not obligations.