RDT&E Program Element · President's Budget PB2027

Tech Transition Program

PE 0604858F·U.S. Air Force·Approp. 3600 — RDT&E·BA4 — Advanced Component Development & Prototypes
FY2027 Request
$166.1M
⚑ Contested — House cuts 1.6%
HitchAI read

U.S. Air Force requests $166.1M in FY2027, sustained across the five-year plan. In the FY2027 defense authorization, the House cut 1.6% (to $163.5M); the Senate funded it in full; House appropriators added 52% (to $251.9M). STR leads the industry work.

FY2027 Request
$166.1M
▲ 3.9% vs FY2026
House mark
$163.5M
▼ $2.6M vs request
FY2026 Enacted
$159.8M
In law

Roll-up of 4 projects. Projects are the summable leaves — the PE total is their sum, never added to it.

For fiscal year 2027, the U.S. Air Force is requesting $166.1M for Tech Transition Program under RDT&E program element 0604858F, up 3.9% over FY2026. In the FY2027 defense authorization, House moved to cut it to $163.5M.

Funding trajectory

Funding profile, FY2025–FY2031

Prior years are actuals, the budget year is the request, and the outyears are the FYDP plan. Estimate types are colored and never summed into one figure.

501001502002500246.3FY25ACTUAL159.8FY26ENACTED166.1FY27REQUEST225.1FY28195.4FY29208.2FY30227.7FY31HOUSE
Actual Enacted Request Outyear (FYDP) House mark
Fiscal YearEstimate TypeAmount ($M)
FY2025Actual246.3
FY2026Enacted159.8
FY2027Request166.1
FY2028Outyear225.1
FY2029Outyear195.4
FY2030Outyear208.2
FY2031Outyear227.7
Where it sits

Acquisition lifecycle

This program is funded in RDT&E Budget Activity 4 — Advanced Component Development & Prototypes.

Complete
Research
BA 1–2
Complete
Advanced Technology
BA 3
Current
Prototyping
BA 4
Later
Development & Fielding
BA 5–7
Inside the program element

4 projects roll up into PE 0604858F

Projects are the summable leaves — the PE total is their sum, never added to it. Program elements and projects carry the full five-year plan; activities stop at the budget year. This PE moves 4% overall, which can hide much larger swings below.

Congressional action

The request is contested

Committee marks on the FY2027 request. Adds and cuts are reconciled in conference before they become law.

RequestPresident's Budget
$166.1M
House NDAA (HASC)HASC
$163.5M −$2.6M · −1.6%
Senate NDAA (SASC)SASC
$166.1M full · +$0
House Approps (HAC-D)HAC_D
$251.9M +$85.8M · +52%
▲ $88.4M chamber gap — unresolved as of 2026-07-27. These are FY2027 authorization marks (NDAA); appropriations and the conference agreement may differ.
Who's building it

Where the FY2027 request goes

Performers named in the R-3 exhibit, resolved into industry, government-lab, and unspecified shares. Budget-justification contract funding, not obligations.

STR
$20.9M · 13%
STR, AMTC-23-06-002 (SAINT) · CPFF
C3BM
$9.1M · 5.5%
C3BM Architecture Development Workforce
Where FY2027 funding flowsShare$M
Industry primes29%48.4
Government labs & warfare centers0.3%0.5
Other / unspecified71%117.1
FY2027 request100%166.1
See STR's full federal contract ledger members
Program detail

Mission & acquisition strategy

Capability development provides the analytic, technical, and programmatic rigor necessary to address operational gaps and opportunities to refine and mature future programs of record, prioritizing and accelerating transition of capabilities in collaboration with operational stakeholders. The Capability Development Enterprise is focused on maturing and transitioning high-impact warfighting capabilities aligned to Air Force Future Force Design through robust concept development, prototyping, and experimentation.

Experimentation campaigns will aid the advancement and transition of advanced technologies by providing the credible evidence decision makers need to make sound strategic decisions and investment choices to provide the warfighter with advanced capabilities. HAF/A5/7, HAF/A8, U.S. Space Force Futures and Integration, and the Office of the Assistant Secretary of the Air Force for Acquisition, Technology and Logistics direct experimentation campaigns. The Integrated Development Office (IDO) located at Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio and Eglin Air Force Base, Florida manages and executes each experimentation campaign. Contracting strategies vary based on the activities of each campaign.

Project 645351, 645352, 645350, 640410 — Prototyping
  • Product Development
  • Management Services
Ask Hitch

Ask this program element

Answers are generated from the figures on this page — the FY2027 justification exhibits and the marks tracked above — and nothing else is consulted. Confirm any figure against the cited exhibit before you use it externally.

H
Questions this page can answer
How does the FY2027 request compare with FY2026, and what does the five-year plan show?What did House do to this request, and what is still unresolved?Which project inside PE 0604858F is growing fastest, and which is shrinking?How is the FY2027 request split between industry and government performers?

This page carries the budget justification and the NDAA marks — nothing else. For what STR has actually been obligated, the ledger is at hitchintel.com/vendors; for live solicitations, hitchintel.com/opportunities. Both are member surfaces.

Provenance

Cite this page

Sources
FY2027 Department of the Air Force RDT&E Budget Justification · Exhibits R-2 / R-3 · PE 0604858F (President's Budget PB2027) — and FY2027 NDAA committee marks, as tracked 2026-07-27.
Suggested citation
HitchAI, "Tech Transition Program (PE 0604858F)," federal budget intelligence, PB2027 vintage. hitchintel.com/programs/0604858F
Machine access
Markdown twin /programs/0604858F.md · MCP mcp.hitchintel.combudget_get_program_element, budget_get_cong_marks
FY2027 Request
$62.6M
▲ 28% vs FY2026
FY2026 Enacted
$49.0M
▼ 67% vs FY2025
FY2025 Actual
$150.5M
Prior year

Prototyping — one RDT&E project inside PE 0604858F. Congressional marks are recorded on the program element, not on a project.

Project 645351 — Prototyping — requests $62.6M in FY2027, 38% of the $166.1M requested for program element 0604858F. Year over year it grows 28% against FY2026.

Funding trajectory

Project 645351 funding, FY2025–FY2031

Prior years are actuals, the budget year is the request, and the outyears are the FYDP plan. Estimate types are colored and never summed into one figure. Projects carry the full five-year plan; the activities inside them stop at the budget year.

501001500150.5FY25ACTUAL49.0FY26ENACTED62.6FY27REQUEST131.9FY28111.3FY29138.5FY30151.9FY31
Actual Enacted Request Outyear (FYDP)
Fiscal YearEstimate TypeAmount ($M)
FY2025Actual150.5
FY2026Enacted49.0
FY2027Request62.6
FY2028Outyear131.9
FY2029Outyear111.3
FY2030Outyear138.5
FY2031Outyear151.9
Inside the project

2 accomplishments / planned programs

The R-2A exhibit. Activities carry the prior, current and budget year only — no five-year plan — and they are descriptive: coverage is partial and they do not always add back to the project, so count them, never total them. Opening lines only here — the full year-by-year narrative is on the project page.

FY2025 actual$62.3M
FY2026 enacted$43.0M
FY2027 request$62.6M

- In FY 2027, FAMM and ETV efforts transition to Program, 0604041F as the program has matured and transitioned to the Program Office. - In FY 2027, conduct rapid prototyping of new capabilities and technologies, furthering military proficiency through Government advancements, commercial technology, and DoW industry. Prototyping areas…

Read the FY2027 plan →
Blended Wing Body - Next Generation Aircraft▼ 100%
FY2025 actual$88.2M
FY2026 enacted$6.0M
FY2027 request$0.0M

- No planned activities for Blended Wing Body in FY 2027.

Project 645351 — every activity in full →
Project detail

What project 645351 buys

The Prototyping project enables demonstrations of emerging technologies and warfighting concepts in an operational environment to determine and evaluate the competitive advantage against our adversaries, how the technology is integrated into the future fight, and acquisition pathways to deliver warfighter capabilities. Lifecycle prototyping investments focus on three major thrusts: (1) advancing capabilities of legacy weapon systems, (2) militarizing novel, mature commercial technologies, and (3) exploring partnerships with Department of the Air Force (DAF) Portfolio Acquisition Executives (PAEs) to rapidly transition technologies. Prototype project investments that advance capabilities of legacy weapon systems focus on kinetic energy effectors for base defense and expeditionary employment operations, autonomy enhancements, architecture development, and software-defined electronic warfare and communication capabilities. Prototype projects that seek to militarize novel, mature commercial technologies will focus on artificial intelligence, autonomy, cyber warfare capabilities, digital engineering, and novel weapon and aircraft technologies. Other areas may be pursued as the technology landscape evolves. This requirement supports performance of a full financial audit as required by title 10 U.S.C. Chapter 9A, Sec 240-D. This program element may include necessary civilian pay expenses required to manage, execute, and deliver weapon system capability. The use of such program funds would be in addition to the civilian pay expenses budgeted in program element 0605829F, 0605831F, 0605833F, 0604858F, or 0605898F

R-3 lines of work
  • Product Development
  • Management Services
FY2027 Request
$61.7M
▼ 31% vs FY2026
FY2026 Enacted
$89.9M
▲ 787% vs FY2025
FY2025 Actual
$10.1M
Prior year

Architecture Design and Evaluation — one RDT&E project inside PE 0604858F. Congressional marks are recorded on the program element, not on a project.

Project 645352 — Architecture Design and Evaluation — requests $61.7M in FY2027, 37% of the $166.1M requested for program element 0604858F. Year over year it falls 31% against FY2026.

Funding trajectory

Project 645352 funding, FY2025–FY2031

Prior years are actuals, the budget year is the request, and the outyears are the FYDP plan. Estimate types are colored and never summed into one figure. Projects carry the full five-year plan; the activities inside them stop at the budget year.

255075010.1FY25ACTUAL89.9FY26ENACTED61.7FY27REQUEST35.8FY2825.6FY2910.2FY3010.4FY31
Actual Enacted Request Outyear (FYDP)
Fiscal YearEstimate TypeAmount ($M)
FY2025Actual10.1
FY2026Enacted89.9
FY2027Request61.7
FY2028Outyear35.8
FY2029Outyear25.6
FY2030Outyear10.2
FY2031Outyear10.4
Inside the project

3 accomplishments / planned programs

The R-2A exhibit. Activities carry the prior, current and budget year only — no five-year plan — and they are descriptive: coverage is partial and they do not always add back to the project, so count them, never total them. Opening lines only here — the full year-by-year narrative is on the project page.

DAF Architecture Design and Integration▼ 7%
FY2025 actual$10.1M
FY2026 enacted$10.4M
FY2027 request$9.7M

Continue to provide subject matter expertise and product development capability to the ASE and ORT to develop and maintain: - Digital Engineering - Create or leverage common way for all the mission integration teams to aggregate various data products and make them available to the community. Fund Model-Based Systems Engineering at…

SAINT▼ 25%
FY2025 actual$0.0M
FY2026 enacted$41.7M
FY2027 request$31.3M

- SAINT will continue to develop and expand on work from FY 2026, moving to more advanced tuning and testing of the prototype using new operational data feeds anticipated to become available in FY 2027. - SAINT will continue to assess and improve prototype performance in maintaining custody of adversary high value moving targets in…

Read the FY2027 plan →
Hawkeye▼ 45%
FY2025 actual$0.0M
FY2026 enacted$37.8M
FY2027 request$20.8M

- Complete testing of weapon/target pairing capabilities. - Complete development of an operational experimentation of a long-range kill chain, including advanced communication techniques. - Complete test of minimum viable product operating on cloud-based digital infrastructure in C3BM transition environment.

Read the FY2027 plan →
Project 645352 — every activity in full →
Who's building it

Named performers on project 645352

Performers named in the R-3 exhibit under this project. Share is of the project's whole FY2027 R-3 total — the same denominator the program-element split uses, so the two read on one scale and will not sum to 100% when unnamed or government work is in the mix. Budget-justification contract funding, not obligations.

STR
$20.9M · 34%
C3BM
$9.1M · 15%
KBR
$8.5M · 14%
RTX / Raytheon
$6.5M · 11%
Project detail

What project 645352 buys

The Department of Air Force (DAF) Portfolio Acquisition Executive (PAE) Command, Control, Communications and Battle Management (C3BM) combined the roles of the Chief Architect and the Chief Engineer into a single office called the Architecture and Systems Engineering (ASE). This office is responsible for the technical integrity of the DAF BATTLE NETWORK as efforts integrate Advanced Battle Management System (ABMS) capabilities, the rest of the DAF's C2 systems, and other Services' capabilities under Joint All-Domain Command and Control (JADC2). Architecture integration in system-of-systems mission threads and environments is critical to deliberately advancing the DAF's technological edge by informing architecture design, acquisition investments, system requirements for future capabilities, and acquisition baseline updates for current systems. The Operational Response Team (ORT) facilitates quick reaction prototyping and experimentation in response to warfighter-led efforts and new relevant technologies. Providing subject matter expertise to support prototyping and experimentation proposed architectures. Architecture Design and Evaluation and the ORT provide the subject matter expertise to develop mission-focused architectures to enable cross-cutting architecture development across PAEs, Major and Field Commands. Architecture Design and Evaluation analyzes science, technology, research, development, and experimentation enterprises to determine the technical and operational feasibility of new technical concepts Architecture Design and Evaluation is directed by the DAF PAE C3BM with oversight by the Secretary of the Air Force along with the Chief of Staff of the Air Force, Chief of Space Operations, and Senior Acquisition Executive. This activity is supported by the Air Force Research Laboratory. This program element may include necessary civilian pay expenses required to manage, execute, and deliver Department of the Air Force Tech Architecture. The use of such program funds would be in addition to the civilian pay expenses budgeted in program element 0605827F, 0605828F, 0605829F, 0605831F, 0605832F, 0605833F, 0605898F, 0606398F, 0605831F and/or 0604858F. In FY 2027, $8.503 million is budgeted in this program for 41 direct Full-Time Equivalent (FTE) civilians.

R-3 lines of work
  • Product Development
  • Support
  • Test and Evaluation
  • Management Services
FY2027 Request
$41.7M
▲ 191% vs FY2026
FY2026 Enacted
$14.3M
▼ 83% vs FY2025
FY2025 Actual
$85.6M
Prior year

Experimentation — one RDT&E project inside PE 0604858F. Congressional marks are recorded on the program element, not on a project.

Project 645350 — Experimentation — requests $41.7M in FY2027, 25% of the $166.1M requested for program element 0604858F. Year over year it grows 191% against FY2026.

Funding trajectory

Project 645350 funding, FY2025–FY2031

Prior years are actuals, the budget year is the request, and the outyears are the FYDP plan. Estimate types are colored and never summed into one figure. Projects carry the full five-year plan; the activities inside them stop at the budget year.

255075085.6FY25ACTUAL14.3FY26ENACTED41.7FY27REQUEST57.4FY2858.4FY2959.5FY3065.4FY31
Actual Enacted Request Outyear (FYDP)
Fiscal YearEstimate TypeAmount ($M)
FY2025Actual85.6
FY2026Enacted14.3
FY2027Request41.7
FY2028Outyear57.4
FY2029Outyear58.4
FY2030Outyear59.5
FY2031Outyear65.4
Inside the project

3 accomplishments / planned programs

The R-2A exhibit. Activities carry the prior, current and budget year only — no five-year plan — and they are descriptive: coverage is partial and they do not always add back to the project, so count them, never total them. Opening lines only here — the full year-by-year narrative is on the project page.

Experimentation Campaigns
FY2025 actual$74.1M
FY2026 enacted$0.0M
FY2027 request$0.0M

- Hawkeye Experimentation Campaign transitioned to Project 645352 Architecture Design and Evaluation in FY 2026.

FY2025 actual$3.5M
FY2026 enacted$8.0M
FY2027 request$35.3M

- Continue to execute Air Force CSAT Blue Horizons Class XII Projects, developing candidate solutions to the Academic Year 2027 strategic dilemma posed by CSAF. Solutions will address the Homeland Defense, LRKC, Counter-HVAA, and Counter-Surface Action Group missions. - Conduct rapid experimentation to evaluate new capabilities and…

Read the FY2027 plan →
USNORTHCOM Modeling, Simulation, and Experimentation▲ 2%
FY2025 actual$6.0M
FY2026 enacted$6.3M
FY2027 request$6.5M

- Continue to develop and mature the USNORTHCOM RDT&E and CoE program to provide innovative solutions and potential capabilities for decision-makers. Leverage a robust, scalable HPC infrastructure to address urgent operational needs through comprehensive experimentation targeting key mission gaps. Conduct modeling, simulation, and…

Project 645350 — every activity in full →
Project detail

What project 645350 buys

The Experimentation project funds experimentation campaigns to explore new concepts and their applications in operationally relevant environments and within a system-of-systems warfighting context. Operational Experimentation Campaigns are directly aligned and integrated with Office of the Secretary of War (OSW) and Department of Air Force (DAF) priorities. Concepts and enabling technologies explored in this activity may include but are not limited to target custody; counter-targeting; airborne targeting and tracking; autonomy; spectrum warfare; artificial intelligence; machine learning; expeditionary base defense; agile combat operations; position, navigation, and timing; and joint all-domain operations. These technologies hold great promise; yet their transition to acquisition programs and fielded capabilities is typically hampered due to uncertainties regarding their military utility and organizational adoption. Experimentation campaigns assess hypotheses that new capabilities will deliver decisive competitive advantage against our adversaries in a dynamic threat environment. These campaigns dramatically shorten and reduce the overall cost of the acquisition process by delivering robust information including operational utility assessments, training, tactics, and procedures (TTPs), total life cycle cost estimates, preliminary product support strategy, reliability and maintainability metrics, operational utility assessments and Doctrine, Organization, Training, Materiel, Leadership and Education, Personnel, Facilities and Policy implications. Campaigns reduce follow-on acquisition and implementation risk through early accomplishment of key learning objectives. A key element of the experimentation campaigns is strong stakeholder partnerships and buy-in from senior DAF leadership including the Secretary of the Air Force, HAF/A5/7, HAF/A8, US Space Force Futures and Integration, Office of the Assistant Secretary of the Air Force for Acquisition, Technology and Logistics, warfighting Major Commands and Combatants Commands (capability recipients/end users), Space and Missile Systems Center, and Air Force Materiel Command (capability developers) that enables rapid transition of capabilities when operational utility, affordability, sustainability, and industrial capacity meet the DAF needs.

R-3 lines of work
  • Product Development
  • Support
  • Test and Evaluation
  • Management Services
FY2027 Request
$0.0M
▼ 100% vs FY2026
FY2026 Enacted
$6.5M
No FY2025 funding
FY2025 Actual
$0.0M
Prior year

Tech Maturation and Risk Reduct/Development — one RDT&E project inside PE 0604858F. Congressional marks are recorded on the program element, not on a project.

Project 640410 — Tech Maturation and Risk Reduct/Development — requests $0.0M in FY2027, 0.0% of the $166.1M requested for program element 0604858F. Year over year it falls 100% against FY2026.

Funding trajectory

Project 640410 funding, FY2025–FY2031

Prior years are actuals, the budget year is the request, and the outyears are the FYDP plan. Estimate types are colored and never summed into one figure. Projects carry the full five-year plan; the activities inside them stop at the budget year.

00.0FY25ACTUAL6.5FY26ENACTED0.0FY27REQUEST0.0FY280.0FY290.0FY300.0FY31
Actual Enacted Request Outyear (FYDP)
Fiscal YearEstimate TypeAmount ($M)
FY2025Actual0.0
FY2026Enacted6.5
FY2027Request0.0
FY2028Outyear0.0
FY2029Outyear0.0
FY2030Outyear0.0
FY2031Outyear0.0
Inside the project

1 accomplishment / planned program

The R-2A exhibit. Activities carry the prior, current and budget year only — no five-year plan — and they are descriptive: coverage is partial and they do not always add back to the project, so count them, never total them.

Tech Maturation and Risk Reduction▼ 100%
FY2025 actual$0.0M
FY2026 enacted$6.5M
FY2027 request$0.0M

FY2027 planned work No activities are planned in FY 2027.

FY2026 to FY2027 change FY 2027 funding decreased compared to FY 2026 by $6.481 million. This decrease is by design. The BPAC created to conduct a one-year concept maturation experiment in support of Low Collateral Defeat component(s) for the DAF Program of Record.

FY2026 plans — current year - Conduct competitive rapid prototyping leveraging the Defense Innovation Unit (DIU) LCD Commercial Solution Opening (CSO) following down-select from the November 2025 LCD test to be conducted by DIU and the Joint CUAS Office (JCO). - The rapid prototyping will advance USAF C-sUAS capabilities to deliver LCD capabilities capable of defeating more advanced threats while reducing risk of collateral effects to surrounding populated areas, congested air spaces, and friendly electromagnetic environments.

Project detail

What project 640410 buys

The DoW requires counter small, unmanned aircraft system (C-sUAS) defeat options with minimal collateral damage in situations where friendly forces and/or civilians are in close proximity to the threat, or where local regulation does not allow for electronic attack or kinetic effectors that have broad down range impact. Specifically existing solutions are poorly equipped to be effective against higher speed and multiple targets (e.g. salvos or swarms). The funding will directly support Defense Innovation Unit (DIU) Replicator 2 Commercial Solutions Opening (CSO) effort to onboard additional low collateral defeat (LCD) options into the Department of the Air Force (DAF) C-sUAS system. Potential options could fall under localized directed energy, kinetic with low-collateral risks, capture/entanglement, localized electronic attack, and/or other novel effectors.

R-3 lines of work
  • Product Development