RDT&E Program Element · President's Budget PB2027

Advanced Concepts and Performance Assessment

PE 0603176C·Defense-Wide·Approp. 0400 — RDT&E·BA3 — Advanced Technology Development
FY2027 Request
$0.0M
Defense-Wide · RDT&E
HitchAI read

Defense-Wide funding falls 100% to a $0.0M request in FY2027 (down from a FY2026 peak).

FY2027 Request
$0.0M
▼ 100% vs FY2026
FY2026 Enacted
$30.9M
▲ 47% vs FY2025
FY2025 Actual
$21.1M
Prior year

Roll-up of 3 projects. Projects are the summable leaves — the PE total is their sum, never added to it.

For fiscal year 2027, Defense-Wide agencies are requesting $0.0M for Advanced Concepts and Performance Assessment under RDT&E program element 0603176C, down 100% from FY2026.

Funding trajectory

Funding profile, FY2025–FY2031

Prior years are actuals, the budget year is the request, and the outyears are the FYDP plan. Estimate types are colored and never summed into one figure.

25021.1FY25ACTUAL30.9FY26ENACTED0.0FY27REQUEST0.0FY280.0FY290.0FY300.0FY31
Actual Enacted Request Outyear (FYDP)
Fiscal YearEstimate TypeAmount ($M)
FY2025Actual21.1
FY2026Enacted30.9
FY2027Request0.0
FY2028Outyear0.0
FY2029Outyear0.0
FY2030Outyear0.0
FY2031Outyear0.0
Where it sits

Acquisition lifecycle

This program is funded in RDT&E Budget Activity 3 — Advanced Technology Development.

Complete
Research
BA 1–2
Current
Advanced Technology
BA 3
Later
Prototyping
BA 4
Later
Development & Fielding
BA 5–7
Inside the program element

3 projects roll up into PE 0603176C

Projects are the summable leaves — the PE total is their sum, never added to it. Program elements and projects carry the full five-year plan; activities stop at the budget year. This PE moves -100% overall, which can hide much larger swings below.

Program detail

Mission & acquisition strategy

The ACPA PE delivers a government concept that integrates concept definition, simulation, analysis, and testbed capability. ACPA's focus is on the exploration of novel and/or emerging capabilities that may have the potential to enhance the Missile Defense System. ACPA centralizes assessment of advanced missile defense technology and delivers insight into the performance of proposed concepts extending the Missile Defense Agency's ability to address evolving threats for the Warfighter.

Project MD71, MD40, MC71 — Advanced Concepts and Performance Assessments
Ask Hitch

Ask this program element

Answers are generated from the figures on this page — the FY2027 justification exhibits and the marks tracked above — and nothing else is consulted. Confirm any figure against the cited exhibit before you use it externally.

H
Questions this page can answer
How does the FY2027 request compare with FY2026, and what does the five-year plan show?Which project inside PE 0603176C is growing fastest, and which is shrinking?In plain terms, what is this program element for and how is it being acquired?

This page carries the budget justification and the NDAA marks — nothing else. For what a contractor has actually been obligated, the ledger is at hitchintel.com/vendors; for live solicitations, hitchintel.com/opportunities. Both are member surfaces.

Provenance

Cite this page

Sources
FY2027 Office of the Secretary of Defense RDT&E Budget Justification · Exhibits R-2 / R-3 · PE 0603176C (President's Budget PB2027).
Suggested citation
HitchAI, "Advanced Concepts and Performance Assessment (PE 0603176C)," federal budget intelligence, PB2027 vintage. hitchintel.com/programs/0603176C
Machine access
Markdown twin /programs/0603176C.md · MCP mcp.hitchintel.combudget_get_program_element
FY2027 Request
$0.0M
▼ 100% vs FY2026
FY2026 Enacted
$26.2M
▲ 58% vs FY2025
FY2025 Actual
$16.6M
Prior year

Advanced Concepts and Performance Assessments — one RDT&E project inside PE 0603176C. Congressional marks are recorded on the program element, not on a project.

Project MD71 — Advanced Concepts and Performance Assessments — requests $0.0M in FY2027. Year over year it falls 100% against FY2026.

Funding trajectory

Project MD71 funding, FY2025–FY2031

Prior years are actuals, the budget year is the request, and the outyears are the FYDP plan. Estimate types are colored and never summed into one figure. Projects carry the full five-year plan; the activities inside them stop at the budget year.

25016.6FY25ACTUAL26.2FY26ENACTED0.0FY27REQUEST0.0FY280.0FY290.0FY300.0FY31
Actual Enacted Request Outyear (FYDP)
Fiscal YearEstimate TypeAmount ($M)
FY2025Actual16.6
FY2026Enacted26.2
FY2027Request0.0
FY2028Outyear0.0
FY2029Outyear0.0
FY2030Outyear0.0
FY2031Outyear0.0
Inside the project

1 accomplishment / planned program

The R-2A exhibit. Activities carry the prior, current and budget year only — no five-year plan — and they are descriptive: coverage is partial and they do not always add back to the project, so count them, never total them. Opening lines only here — the full year-by-year narrative is on the project page.

Advanced Concepts and Performance Assessment▼ 100%
FY2025 actual$16.6M
FY2026 enacted$26.2M
FY2027 request$0.0M

No funding is requested in FY 2027.

Project MD71 — every activity in full →
Project detail

What project MD71 buys

ACPA centralizes advanced technology concept modeling, simulation, software, and analysis. Integrating models of promising disruptive technical solutions into Missile Defense System system-level simulations enables leadership to make data driven acquisition and technology investment decisions. Assess concepts that improve or adapt existing systems to address capability gaps and increase readiness to act in defending the Homeland and its Allies. Examples of efforts required to quantify the contribution of disruptive technologies may include, but are not limited to, environmental experimentation and phenomenological characterization required for new sensor concepts, advanced weapon technologies, and emerging directed energy concepts. In addition, facilitate stakeholder collaboration on advanced concepts to ensure transition into functional areas and programs of record. Using a technology development testbed approach, ACPA enables assessment and characterization of disruptive and incremental technology improvements to inform requirements and evaluate missile defense elements, components, and/or sub-component technologies and to assess maturity as it relates to readiness for transition to the future Missile Defense System. ACPA promotes informed decision making early in the acquisition life-cycle to maximize investments and successful transition into the Missile Defense System.

FY2027 Request
$0.0M
▼ 100% vs FY2026
FY2026 Enacted
$0.7M
▲ 0.0% vs FY2025
FY2025 Actual
$0.7M
Prior year

Program-Wide Support — one RDT&E project inside PE 0603176C. Congressional marks are recorded on the program element, not on a project.

Project MD40 — Program-Wide Support — requests $0.0M in FY2027. Year over year it falls 100% against FY2026.

Funding trajectory

Project MD40 funding, FY2025–FY2031

Prior years are actuals, the budget year is the request, and the outyears are the FYDP plan. Estimate types are colored and never summed into one figure. Projects carry the full five-year plan; the activities inside them stop at the budget year.

00.7FY25ACTUAL0.7FY26ENACTED0.0FY27REQUEST0.0FY280.0FY290.0FY300.0FY31
Actual Enacted Request Outyear (FYDP)
Fiscal YearEstimate TypeAmount ($M)
FY2025Actual0.7
FY2026Enacted0.7
FY2027Request0.0
FY2028Outyear0.0
FY2029Outyear0.0
FY2030Outyear0.0
FY2031Outyear0.0
Inside the project

1 accomplishment / planned program

The R-2A exhibit. Activities carry the prior, current and budget year only — no five-year plan — and they are descriptive: coverage is partial and they do not always add back to the project, so count them, never total them.

Program Wide Support▼ 100%
FY2025 actual$0.7M
FY2026 enacted$0.7M
FY2027 request$0.0M

FY2027 planned work - No funding is requested in FY 2027.

FY2026 to FY2027 change - The decrease from FY 2026 to FY 2027 is due to no funding is requested in FY 2027.

Project detail

What project MD40 buys

PWS contains non-headquarters management costs in support of the Missile Defense Agency (MDA) functions and activities across the entire Missile Defense System. These functions include Government Civilians and Contract Support Services. This effort provides integrity and oversight of the Missile Defense System as well as supports MDA in the development and evaluation of technologies that will respond to the changing threat. Additionally, PWS includes personnel to support global deployments performing deployment site preparation, site activation, and provides facility capabilities for MDA Executing Agent locations worldwide. Other MDA wide costs include: physical and technical security; civilian drug testing; audit readiness; the Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) program; legal services and settlements; travel and agency training; office, equipment, vehicle, and warehouse leases; utilities and base operations across multiple geographic locations; commercial and ancillary facility services; management of all facility aspects regardless of lifecycle stage; supplies and maintenance; compliance with statutory environmental requirements; data and unified communications support; materiel and readiness and central property management of equipment; Facilities Sustainment, Restoration and Modernization (FSRM) program (formerly Real Property Maintenance) to keep the Department's inventory of facilities in good working order; and similar operating expenses. PWS is allocated on a pro-rata basis across most Agency PEs and therefore fluctuates per PE by FY based on the total Agency budget in that FY.

FY2027 Request
$0.0M
▼ 100% vs FY2026
FY2026 Enacted
$3.9M
▲ 4.1% vs FY2025
FY2025 Actual
$3.8M
Prior year

Cyber Operations — one RDT&E project inside PE 0603176C. Congressional marks are recorded on the program element, not on a project.

Project MC71 — Cyber Operations — requests $0.0M in FY2027. Year over year it falls 100% against FY2026.

Funding trajectory

Project MC71 funding, FY2025–FY2031

Prior years are actuals, the budget year is the request, and the outyears are the FYDP plan. Estimate types are colored and never summed into one figure. Projects carry the full five-year plan; the activities inside them stop at the budget year.

03.8FY25ACTUAL3.9FY26ENACTED0.0FY27REQUEST0.0FY280.0FY290.0FY300.0FY31
Actual Enacted Request Outyear (FYDP)
Fiscal YearEstimate TypeAmount ($M)
FY2025Actual3.8
FY2026Enacted3.9
FY2027Request0.0
FY2028Outyear0.0
FY2029Outyear0.0
FY2030Outyear0.0
FY2031Outyear0.0
Inside the project

1 accomplishment / planned program

The R-2A exhibit. Activities carry the prior, current and budget year only — no five-year plan — and they are descriptive: coverage is partial and they do not always add back to the project, so count them, never total them.

Information Assurance / Cyber Network Defense▼ 100%
FY2025 actual$3.8M
FY2026 enacted$3.9M
FY2027 request$0.0M

FY2027 planned work No funding is requested in FY 2027.

FY2026 to FY2027 change Decrease from FY 2026 to FY 2027 reflects the transfer of funds to PE 0603180C MC25 for Cyber Operations to provide information assurance and cyber network defense.

Project detail

What project MC71 buys

This project supports the monitoring and tracking of Cybersecurity mitigations as required in the Department of Defense Instruction Number 8510.01, as amended which establishes Risk Management Framework (RMF) requirements for Department of War (DoW) Information Technology (IT). Funds in this project implement and sustain DoW-required RMF and associated Controls Validation Testing activities, analysis of validation results, risk assessments and reviews of proposed Program Manager/Information Assurance System Security Manager Plans of Action and Milestones (POAMs) for enabling modeling and simulation mission systems. This project captures the RMF documentation (artifacts, validation results, Information Assurance (IA) risk assessment results, and the Missile Defense Agency (MDA) Authorizing Official and Chief Information Officer accreditation decisions) into the Defense Information Systems Agency's Enterprise Mission Assurance Support Service system. Hardware and software upgrades required to meet DoW standards are supported by funding in this project. Independent verification and validation team actions ensure the availability, integrity, authentication, confidentiality and non-repudiation of the MDA mission, test and administrative systems. Activities in the project are necessary to comply with the Federal Information Security Management Act.