RDT&E Program Element · President's Budget PB2027

BMD Enabling Programs

PE 0603890C·Defense-Wide·Approp. 0400 — RDT&E·BA4 — Advanced Component Development & Prototypes
FY2027 Request
$1.46B
⚑ Contested — House cuts 19%
HitchAI read

Defense-Wide funding ramps 143% to a $1.46B request in FY2027 — the program's peak, sustained across the five-year plan. In the FY2027 defense authorization, the House cut 19% (to $1.18B); the Senate cut 1.0% (to $1.44B); House appropriators cut 13% (to $1.27B). JACOBS leads the industry work.

FY2027 Request
$1,457.4M
▲ 143% vs FY2026
House mark
$1,180.4M
▼ $277.0M vs request
FY2026 Enacted
$599.9M
In law

Roll-up of 9 projects. Projects are the summable leaves — the PE total is their sum, never added to it.

For fiscal year 2027, Defense-Wide agencies are requesting $1.46B for BMD Enabling Programs under RDT&E program element 0603890C, up 143% over FY2026. In the FY2027 defense authorization, House moved to cut it to $1.18B.

Funding trajectory

Funding profile, FY2025–FY2031

Prior years are actuals, the budget year is the request, and the outyears are the FYDP plan. Estimate types are colored and never summed into one figure.

4008001,2000611.1FY25ACTUAL599.9FY26ENACTED1,457.4FY27REQUEST1,398.7FY281,342.7FY291,321.9FY301,348.4FY31HOUSE
Actual Enacted Request Outyear (FYDP) House mark
Fiscal YearEstimate TypeAmount ($M)
FY2025Actual611.1
FY2026Enacted599.9
FY2027Request1,457.4
FY2028Outyear1,398.7
FY2029Outyear1,342.7
FY2030Outyear1,321.9
FY2031Outyear1,348.4
Where it sits

Acquisition lifecycle

This program is funded in RDT&E Budget Activity 4 — Advanced Component Development & Prototypes.

Complete
Research
BA 1–2
Complete
Advanced Technology
BA 3
Current
Prototyping
BA 4
Later
Development & Fielding
BA 5–7
Inside the program element

9 projects roll up into PE 0603890C

Projects are the summable leaves — the PE total is their sum, never added to it. Program elements and projects carry the full five-year plan; activities stop at the budget year. This PE moves 143% overall, which can hide much larger swings below. The 8 largest have their own view above; the rest are shown in full here.

Congressional action

The request is contested

Committee marks on the FY2027 request. Adds and cuts are reconciled in conference before they become law.

RequestPresident's Budget
$1,457.4M
House NDAA (HASC)HASC
$1,180.4M −$277.0M · −19%
Senate NDAA (SASC)SASC
$1,442.4M −$15.0M · −1.0%
House Approps (HAC-D)HAC_D
$1,266.3M −$191.1M · −13%
▲ $262.0M chamber gap — unresolved as of 2026-07-27. These are FY2027 authorization marks (NDAA); appropriations and the conference agreement may differ.
Who's building it

Where the FY2027 request goes

Performers named in the R-3 exhibit, resolved into industry, government-lab, and unspecified shares. Budget-justification contract funding, not obligations.

JACOBS
$204.2M · 14%
Requirements and Design - Service Level Agreement - SLA, Cloud, and Software · CPIF
Lockheed Martin
$38.1M · 2.6%
M&S Improvements - M&S Framework · CPFF
Where FY2027 funding flowsShare$M
Industry primes30%441.4
Government labs & warfare centers26%377.8
Other / unspecified44%638.3
FY2027 request100%1,457.4
See JACOBS's full federal contract ledger members
Program detail

Mission & acquisition strategy

The Missile Defense System Information Management Systems budget project will drive the transformative modernization of the Missile Defense System's information management capabilities to include: -- Enabling rapid data-driven decision making, improved integration and collaboration, and a flexible and scalable architecture -- A cohesive, forward-thinking, Enterprise-wide Model Based Systems Engineering capability that will unify expertise, tools, and data management across all programs and build a connected ecosystem of data, digital twins, processes, and rapid capability delivery.

The M&S acquisition strategy utilizes full and open competition to develop, acquire and deliver the integrated architectures/frameworks while the Elements, using the same open competition methods, develop and deliver models of their systems. M&S product centers integrate the suite of M&S into a composite simulation capability, all based on an open architecture. M&S achieves this end-state via close collaboration between its integrating contractor team and those of the Element prime contractors, with additional technical standards and engineering oversight provided by Federally Funded Research & Development Centers and University Affiliated Research Centers.

Project MD30, MC30, MD24, MD31, MD28, MD40, MT23, MD32, MC31 — BMD Information Management Systems
  • Support
  • Management Services
Ask Hitch

Ask this program element

Answers are generated from the figures on this page — the FY2027 justification exhibits and the marks tracked above — and nothing else is consulted. Confirm any figure against the cited exhibit before you use it externally.

H
Questions this page can answer
How does the FY2027 request compare with FY2026, and what does the five-year plan show?What did House do to this request, and what is still unresolved?Which project inside PE 0603890C is growing fastest, and which is shrinking?How is the FY2027 request split between industry and government performers?

This page carries the budget justification and the NDAA marks — nothing else. For what JACOBS has actually been obligated, the ledger is at hitchintel.com/vendors; for live solicitations, hitchintel.com/opportunities. Both are member surfaces.

Provenance

Cite this page

Sources
FY2027 Office of the Secretary of Defense RDT&E Budget Justification · Exhibits R-2 / R-3 · PE 0603890C (President's Budget PB2027) — and FY2027 NDAA committee marks, as tracked 2026-07-27.
Suggested citation
HitchAI, "BMD Enabling Programs (PE 0603890C)," federal budget intelligence, PB2027 vintage. hitchintel.com/programs/0603890C
Machine access
Markdown twin /programs/0603890C.md · MCP mcp.hitchintel.combudget_get_program_element, budget_get_cong_marks
FY2027 Request
$545.8M
▲ 310% vs FY2026
FY2026 Enacted
$133.0M
▲ 33% vs FY2025
FY2025 Actual
$99.7M
Prior year

BMD Information Management Systems — one RDT&E project inside PE 0603890C. Congressional marks are recorded on the program element, not on a project.

Project MD30 — BMD Information Management Systems — requests $545.8M in FY2027, 37% of the $1.46B requested for program element 0603890C. Year over year it grows 310% against FY2026.

Funding trajectory

Project MD30 funding, FY2025–FY2031

Prior years are actuals, the budget year is the request, and the outyears are the FYDP plan. Estimate types are colored and never summed into one figure. Projects carry the full five-year plan; the activities inside them stop at the budget year.

150300450099.7FY25ACTUAL133.0FY26ENACTED545.8FY27REQUEST551.0FY28451.3FY29442.0FY30447.5FY31
Actual Enacted Request Outyear (FYDP)
Fiscal YearEstimate TypeAmount ($M)
FY2025Actual99.7
FY2026Enacted133.0
FY2027Request545.8
FY2028Outyear551.0
FY2029Outyear451.3
FY2030Outyear442.0
FY2031Outyear447.5
Inside the project

6 accomplishments / planned programs

The R-2A exhibit. Activities carry the prior, current and budget year only — no five-year plan — and they are descriptive: coverage is partial and they do not always add back to the project, so count them, never total them. Opening lines only here — the full year-by-year narrative is on the project page.

FY2025 actual$16.6M
FY2026 enacted$39.4M
FY2027 request$105.0M

- Initiate mandated 4ENO migration of common use IT and DoDNet users to DISA. - Refresh EoL/EoS IT infrastructure for efficient and compliant delivery in support of Missile Defense System programs including Missile Defense System - Next capabilities.

Read the FY2027 plan →
FY2025 actual$4.8M
FY2026 enacted$15.6M
FY2027 request$292.2M

- Continue hybrid Cloud consolidation to Joint Warfighter Cloud Capability. - Continue deployment of Next-Generation Environment (NGE) to address future Missile Defense System-Next capabilities and increasing cloud requirements. - Expand hybrid Cloud support to address future Missile Defense System-Next capabilities and increasing cloud…

Read the FY2027 plan →
FY2025 actual$26.8M
FY2026 enacted$29.9M
FY2027 request$90.1M

- Development and sustainment of classified and unclassified data integration and AI platform using DoW approved commercial Software as a Service (SaaS). - Develop and sustain Top Secret (TS) Decision Advantage Platform. - Develop new algorithms against varied feature space leveraging AI and Machine Learning (ML). - Provide advanced…

Read the FY2027 plan →
Unified Communications▲ 49%
FY2025 actual$22.9M
FY2026 enacted$26.1M
FY2027 request$38.8M

- Refresh EoL/EoS Unified Communications infrastructure for multiple presentation and integration centers across the geographically dispersed MDA footprint for efficient and compliant delivery of classified and unclassified Agency collaboration capabilities.

Portal and Data Services▼ 15%
FY2025 actual$12.8M
FY2026 enacted$10.6M
FY2027 request$9.0M

Decrease from FY 2026 to FY 2027 reflects the realignment of budget from Portal and Data Services R2A to Special Purpose Processing Nodes R2A for Global Enterprise Modernization Software and Support (GEMSS) and Virtual Machine Software (VMWare) and the transition of on-premise SharePoint 2013 to SharePoint Online via DoD365-J services.

Business Automation Services▼ 5%
FY2025 actual$15.7M
FY2026 enacted$11.3M
FY2027 request$10.8M

Decrease from FY 2026 to FY 2027 reflects migration of on-premise application hardware to the Cloud, which will result in cost savings utilized for additional EoL/EoS refresh of IT infrastructure for efficient and compliant support of Missile Defense System programs.

Project MD30 — every activity in full →
Who's building it

Named performers on project MD30

Performers named in the R-3 exhibit under this project. Share is of the project's whole FY2027 R-3 total — the same denominator the program-element split uses, so the two read on one scale and will not sum to 100% when unnamed or government work is in the mix. Budget-justification contract funding, not obligations.

JACOBS
$62.9M · 12%
NETWORK MANAGEMENT RESOURCES
$31.7M · 5.8%
Palantir
$5.1M · 0.9%
FIVE STONES RESEARCH
$4.1M · 0.8%
Project detail

What project MD30 buys

The Missile Defense System Information Management Systems budget project will drive the transformative modernization of the Missile Defense System's information management capabilities to include: -- Enabling rapid data-driven decision making, improved integration and collaboration, and a flexible and scalable architecture -- A cohesive, forward-thinking, Enterprise-wide Model Based Systems Engineering capability that will unify expertise, tools, and data management across all programs and build a connected ecosystem of data, digital twins, processes, and rapid capability delivery. This will also establish authoritative sources of truth across the Missile Defense system lifecycle and increase efficiency, collaboration, and innovation to build a strong foundation for the future and achieve economies of scale. -- Leveraging AI, Modular Open Systems Architecture (MOSA), and commercial innovations to align with Department of War guidance, expedite delivery of advanced missile defense capabilities to the warfighter, and ensure resilient, scalable, and secure operations against evolving threats. The Decision Advantage Platform provides boardroom and battlefield decision products to provide capability to the warfighter at speed and scale. This includes but is not limited to asset scheduling and readiness data to the COCOMs to support warfighter operations, as well as acquisition and programmatic decision tools to field capability. It also funds IT mission critical functions necessary for the efficient operations and safeguarding of Missile Defense System information in compliance with Department of War (DoW) policies and in keeping pace with the ever-growing cyber threat which is one of the most serious economic and national security challenges we face. IT is critical to the day-to-day functions of Missile Defense Agency (MDA) personnel to communicate (classified and unclassified) with each other, Congress, senior DoW and other United States Government agency personnel, Combatant Commanders, North Atlantic Treaty Organization partners, and other industry partners.

R-3 lines of work
  • Support
  • Management Services
FY2027 Request
$273.4M
▲ 302% vs FY2026
FY2026 Enacted
$67.9M
▼ 26% vs FY2025
FY2025 Actual
$91.6M
Prior year

Cyber Operations — one RDT&E project inside PE 0603890C. Congressional marks are recorded on the program element, not on a project.

Project MC30 — Cyber Operations — requests $273.4M in FY2027, 19% of the $1.46B requested for program element 0603890C. Year over year it grows 302% against FY2026.

Funding trajectory

Project MC30 funding, FY2025–FY2031

Prior years are actuals, the budget year is the request, and the outyears are the FYDP plan. Estimate types are colored and never summed into one figure. Projects carry the full five-year plan; the activities inside them stop at the budget year.

50100150200250091.6FY25ACTUAL67.9FY26ENACTED273.4FY27REQUEST208.9FY28210.5FY29211.2FY30212.6FY31
Actual Enacted Request Outyear (FYDP)
Fiscal YearEstimate TypeAmount ($M)
FY2025Actual91.6
FY2026Enacted67.9
FY2027Request273.4
FY2028Outyear208.9
FY2029Outyear210.5
FY2030Outyear211.2
FY2031Outyear212.6
Inside the project

7 accomplishments / planned programs

The R-2A exhibit. Activities carry the prior, current and budget year only — no five-year plan — and they are descriptive: coverage is partial and they do not always add back to the project, so count them, never total them. Opening lines only here — the full year-by-year narrative is on the project page.

Preventing Malicious Cybersecurity Activity▼ 100%
FY2025 actual$16.6M
FY2026 enacted$12.0M
FY2027 request$0.0M

- No funding is requested in FY 2027.

Planning, Policy Development, Workforce Training & Force Management▲ 354%
FY2025 actual$3.5M
FY2026 enacted$2.8M
FY2027 request$12.5M

- Enhance data standardization across all Missile Defense System - Next components. - Expand AI and Machine Learning (ML) analysis efforts.

Continuous Monitoring▼ 100%
FY2025 actual$8.5M
FY2026 enacted$8.1M
FY2027 request$0.0M

Decrease from FY 2026 to FY 2027 reflects re-alignment of this R-2a Accomplishment (Continuous Monitoring) and requirements to comply with OMB Cybersecurity Taxonomy.

FY2025 actual$62.0M
FY2026 enacted$44.1M
FY2027 request$100.6M

- Initiates end-to-end support for DCO requirements for new systems, long-haul communications transition, cryptographic, end user support, and legacy cybersecurity tool modernization, and increased SAP network and storage requirements to support Missile Defense System - Next requirements.

Read the FY2027 plan →
Facility Related Control Systems (FRCS)▲ 17%
FY2025 actual$1.0M
FY2026 enacted$0.9M
FY2027 request$1.1M

The exhibit describes this work once, for project MC30 as a whole, rather than per activity. Read the project justification →

Cybersecurity Risk ManagementNEW
FY2025 actual$0.0M
FY2026 enacted$0.0M
FY2027 request$9.2M

Increase from FY 2026 to FY 2027 provides for the transfer of funding and requirements to this R-2a Accomplishment (Cybersecurity Risk Management) to comply with the OMB Cybersecurity Taxonomy.

FY2025 actual$0.0M
FY2026 enacted$0.0M
FY2027 request$150.1M

- Extend Comply-to-Connect and Zero Trust services and capabilities to network infrastructure across RDT&E environments. - Implement DevSecOps environments/infrastructure. - Expand Agency Identity and Credentialed Access Management. - Expand Cloud environments. - Implement mandated DoW CIO cryptographic technical refresh to address…

Read the FY2027 plan →
Project MC30 — every activity in full →
Who's building it

Named performers on project MC30

Performers named in the R-3 exhibit under this project. Share is of the project's whole FY2027 R-3 total — the same denominator the program-element split uses, so the two read on one scale and will not sum to 100% when unnamed or government work is in the mix. Budget-justification contract funding, not obligations.

JACOBS
$104.5M · 38%
FIVE STONES RESEARCH
$6.6M · 2.4%
Rothe Ares JV
$2.4M · 0.9%
Project detail

What project MC30 buys

Cyber Operations supports Defense Modernization and Missile Defense Agency (MDA) Chief Information Officer (CIO) priorities to fully support network command, control and communications and Cybersecurity, increase system reliability to build warfighter confidence, and address advanced cyber threats. MDA's Office of the CIO has prioritized four program topics: (1) Detect, Analyze and Mitigate Intrusions; (2) Prevent Malicious Cyber Activity; (3) Planning, Policy Development, Workforce Training & Force Management; and (4) Cybersecurity Risk Management. In order to support the prioritized program topics, MDA must implement a multi-tiered cybersecurity monitoring and risk management capability to protect critical Missile Defense System data and systems from rapidly evolving internal and external threats. The funds requested in this PE provide Missile Defense Agency's legacy and new system development the operational cybersecurity capabilities to meet President Trump's Cybersecurity Strategy for America, March 2026 mandates; specifically facilitating MDA's capability to modernize and secure government networks and critical infrastructure, sustain MDA's superiority in critical and emerging technologies, and build cyber operations talent and capacity to meet growing adversarial threat capabilities.

R-3 lines of work
  • Support
  • Management Services
FY2027 Request
$265.3M
▲ 55% vs FY2026
FY2026 Enacted
$170.6M
▲ 2.7% vs FY2025
FY2025 Actual
$166.2M
Prior year

System Engineering & Integration — one RDT&E project inside PE 0603890C. Congressional marks are recorded on the program element, not on a project.

Project MD24 — System Engineering & Integration — requests $265.3M in FY2027, 18% of the $1.46B requested for program element 0603890C. Year over year it grows 55% against FY2026.

Funding trajectory

Project MD24 funding, FY2025–FY2031

Prior years are actuals, the budget year is the request, and the outyears are the FYDP plan. Estimate types are colored and never summed into one figure. Projects carry the full five-year plan; the activities inside them stop at the budget year.

501001502002500166.2FY25ACTUAL170.6FY26ENACTED265.3FY27REQUEST269.0FY28288.7FY29261.8FY30270.8FY31
Actual Enacted Request Outyear (FYDP)
Fiscal YearEstimate TypeAmount ($M)
FY2025Actual166.2
FY2026Enacted170.6
FY2027Request265.3
FY2028Outyear269.0
FY2029Outyear288.7
FY2030Outyear261.8
FY2031Outyear270.8
Inside the project

9 accomplishments / planned programs

The R-2A exhibit. Activities carry the prior, current and budget year only — no five-year plan — and they are descriptive: coverage is partial and they do not always add back to the project, so count them, never total them. Opening lines only here — the full year-by-year narrative is on the project page.

FY2025 actual$53.0M
FY2026 enacted$56.0M
FY2027 request$70.7M

- Plan and execute Digital Transformation; automate the architecture development lifecycle and systems engineering process leveraging digital tools, cybersecurity, and artificial intelligence/machine learning (AI/ML). - Model engineering processes using model based systems engineering (MBSE); begin integration into the Government…

Read the FY2027 plan →
FY2025 actual$21.1M
FY2026 enacted$28.9M
FY2027 request$40.9M

- Finalize, configure control, and deliver the JTMC Bridge Standard v3.0 updates. - Initial JTMC Bridge fielding (into Service PoRs) to include Integrated Battle Command System (IBCS), CEC/CTN, TOC-L and ABADS-MD. - Integrate JTIFC and the Joint Service LVC environment into the Guam Defense System (GDS) Joint Program Office (JPO) Defense…

Read the FY2027 plan →
System-Level Verification and Assessment▲ 16%
FY2025 actual$31.5M
FY2026 enacted$33.6M
FY2027 request$39.1M

Increase from FY 2026 to FY 2027 provides test analysis tool and assessment process enhancements to support the rapid pace of missile defense performance assessments.

Knowledge Centers▼ 100%
FY2025 actual$11.6M
FY2026 enacted$8.1M
FY2027 request$0.0M

No funding requested for this activity.

FY2025 actual$18.0M
FY2026 enacted$17.7M
FY2027 request$20.3M

- Finalize and submit FA-2 COAs and costs / schedules projections supporting focused area regions within U.S. Indo-Pacific Command. - Refine FY 2025 design, development and assessment of FA-3 COAs concentrated in weapons, sensors and communication to support detect and control portion of the kill chain. - Initiate design, development…

Open this activity →
System Engineering, Engineering Analysis and Quick Response Team▲ 19%
FY2025 actual$11.0M
FY2026 enacted$10.4M
FY2027 request$12.3M

Increase from FY 2026 to FY 2027 provides additional performance analysis for missile defense architecture options and Real World Events.

Discrimination▼ 68%
FY2025 actual$16.3M
FY2026 enacted$14.2M
FY2027 request$4.6M

Decrease from FY 2026 to FY 2027 reflects a realignment of resources to better address future missile defense program responsibilities and requirements.

Manufacturing and Producibility▼ 25%
FY2025 actual$3.7M
FY2026 enacted$1.7M
FY2027 request$1.3M

Decrease from FY 2026 to FY 2027 reflects the reduction of MDA contract services to implement and execute the President's Executive Order 14222 to synergize efforts and gain efficiencies. The reduction of funding for contract services is undertaken in direct support of the President's executive order, which prioritizes cost efficiency…

FY2025 actual$0.0M
FY2026 enacted$0.0M
FY2027 request$76.0M

- Conduct specialized architecture studies and deliver architecture concepts to provide global reach against advanced and emerging threats. - Conduct system-of-systems engineering employing modernized model-based systems engineering techniques to: -- Provide signatures and other threat data to support System-level requirements definition…

Read the FY2027 plan →
Project MD24 — every activity in full →
Who's building it

Named performers on project MD24

Performers named in the R-3 exhibit under this project. Share is of the project's whole FY2027 R-3 total — the same denominator the program-element split uses, so the two read on one scale and will not sum to 100% when unnamed or government work is in the mix. Budget-justification contract funding, not obligations.

GRAY ANALYTICS
$10.4M · 3.9%
Boeing
$8.4M · 3.1%
SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTERNATIONAL
$8.3M · 3.1%
NTSI
$6.6M · 2.5%
Project detail

What project MD24 buys

System Engineering & Integration (SE&I) defines, designs, tests and integrates the Missile Defense System, and provides analysis, decision support and planning activities for real-world operations to the National Command Authority, Joint Staff, Military Services, Combatant Commanders, Operational Test Agencies, Director of Operational Test and Evaluation, Allies, and others. SE&I Major Program Goals: - Plan, design, develop, integrate, and test a layered Missile Defense System that provides the required performance and global reach. - Provide System-level engineering to Missile Defense System Elements, and lead collaborative cross-Element, cross-Component engineering. - Employ digital tools to refine and automate engineering processes and technical products required for Missile Defense System development - Maintain the Capability Gap Tracker (CGT) to systematically track and prioritize the capability gaps in the Missile Defense Agency (MDA) Program of Record (POR), with respect to forecasted threat. - Plan, design, develop future architecture plans into integrated engineering requirements. - Analyze architecture alternatives and new technologies, and develop requirements to respond to the proliferation of short, medium, and long-range advanced missile threats. - As technical authority for Integrated Air and Missile Defense (IAMD), provide a consistent, disciplined systems engineering process using a multi-Service team to integrate Joint IAMD systems. - Provide System-level forums to track, assess, and improve hardware and software reliability. - Assess Missile Defense System capabilities and limitations. - Develop performance assessment requirements and evaluate new capabilities in support of fielding decisions. - Identify critical conditions and data required to develop test campaigns to demonstrate Missile Defense System performance. - Identify System issues occurring in ground and flight tests and lead the effort to resolve. - Ensure the Missile Defense System is complementary to and interoperable with North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) and other theater systems. - Develop and field integrated Element capabilities to improve the capability to identify lethal reentry vehicles and non-lethal threat objects.

R-3 lines of work
  • Support
  • Management Services
FY2027 Request
$140.2M
▲ 153% vs FY2026
FY2026 Enacted
$55.3M
▼ 9.2% vs FY2025
FY2025 Actual
$60.9M
Prior year

Modeling & Simulation — one RDT&E project inside PE 0603890C. Congressional marks are recorded on the program element, not on a project.

Project MD31 — Modeling & Simulation — requests $140.2M in FY2027, 9.6% of the $1.46B requested for program element 0603890C. Year over year it grows 153% against FY2026.

Funding trajectory

Project MD31 funding, FY2025–FY2031

Prior years are actuals, the budget year is the request, and the outyears are the FYDP plan. Estimate types are colored and never summed into one figure. Projects carry the full five-year plan; the activities inside them stop at the budget year.

50100150060.9FY25ACTUAL55.3FY26ENACTED140.2FY27REQUEST142.2FY28155.9FY29161.8FY30165.6FY31
Actual Enacted Request Outyear (FYDP)
Fiscal YearEstimate TypeAmount ($M)
FY2025Actual60.9
FY2026Enacted55.3
FY2027Request140.2
FY2028Outyear142.2
FY2029Outyear155.9
FY2030Outyear161.8
FY2031Outyear165.6
Inside the project

3 accomplishments / planned programs

The R-2A exhibit. Activities carry the prior, current and budget year only — no five-year plan — and they are descriptive: coverage is partial and they do not always add back to the project, so count them, never total them. Opening lines only here — the full year-by-year narrative is on the project page.

M&S Requirements, Design Support, Scenario Optimization▲ 23%
FY2025 actual$10.7M
FY2026 enacted$9.3M
FY2027 request$11.4M

Increase from FY 2026 to FY 2027 provides for planning, development, integration, and deployment of additional M&S framework, models, and tools in support of future Missile Defense development and integration.

M&S Improvements▲ 23%
FY2025 actual$18.7M
FY2026 enacted$12.6M
FY2027 request$15.6M

Increase from FY 2026 to FY 2027 provides M&S enhancements supporting Missile Defense System development and testing.

FY2025 actual$31.5M
FY2026 enacted$33.4M
FY2027 request$113.2M

- Define and begin implementation of governance required to develop, employ and sustain the cloud-based Digital M&S capability. - Establish initial digital framework and simulation environment capability as a baseline for performance assessment. - Begin refactoring legacy Frameworks, Core Truth Models and element M&S representations into…

Read the FY2027 plan →
Project MD31 — every activity in full →
Who's building it

Named performers on project MD31

Performers named in the R-3 exhibit under this project. Share is of the project's whole FY2027 R-3 total — the same denominator the program-element split uses, so the two read on one scale and will not sum to 100% when unnamed or government work is in the mix. Budget-justification contract funding, not obligations.

Lockheed Martin
$38.1M · 27%
Northrop Grumman
$23.4M · 17%
DECIBEL RESEARCH
$17.2M · 12%
AMENTUM SERVICES
$3.7M · 2.6%
Project detail

What project MD31 buys

The Missile Defense Agency's (MDA) M&S program consists of system and product planning, development, integration, and operation; threat model development, verification, and analysis; and integration and deployment of improved M&S capabilities. M&S efforts are tailored to the specific needs of the Agency's test events and to match Missile Defense System components in their various stages of development, ranging from low-to-medium fidelity analyses supporting concept definitions studies, to high-fidelity models used to support engineering level activities. MDA validates and accredits System-level models and simulations by anchoring them to ground and flight test events, per the Integrated Master Test Plan (IMTP), to enable accurate and comprehensive assessments. MDA's M&S systems and products provide analysis, decision-making, and planning capabilities for Real-World Operations to inform the National Command Authority, Joint Staff, Military Services, North Atlantic Treaty Organization, Combatant Commanders, Operational Test Authority (OTAs), Director of Operational Test & Evaluation (DOT&E), and Allies. MDA's M&S Program executes a single, integrated, and synchronized program to manage System-level M&S development and sustainment; improve System Flight and Ground Test execution, provide a Cloud-based digital assessment venue; leverage MDA test activities to collect data to anchor models and simulations; and support Warfighter training and tactics validation. The M&S program also addresses the following key elements of DOT&E assessments: Ensure that future M&S architectures are composable and flexible, and simplify the integration process to conserve resources and improve capabilities; Ensure that future M&S architectures incorporate and require the use of consistent truth representations (phenomenology, lethality, environmental factors, threat simulations, etc.); Improve cross-organizational system engineering processes to optimize requirements generation and ensure the inclusion of all stakeholders; Develop refined M&S accreditation criteria between MDA and the OTA; Enable top-down systems engineering and management of agency-wide M&S federations. The funds requested in this PE provide both legacy and Global Missile Defense Capability development for the United States, its deployed forces, allies, and partners.

R-3 lines of work
  • Product Development
  • Support
FY2027 Request
$66.8M
▲ 20% vs FY2026
FY2026 Enacted
$55.9M
▼ 5.8% vs FY2025
FY2025 Actual
$59.4M
Prior year

Intelligence & Security — one RDT&E project inside PE 0603890C. Congressional marks are recorded on the program element, not on a project.

Project MD28 — Intelligence & Security — requests $66.8M in FY2027, 4.6% of the $1.46B requested for program element 0603890C. Year over year it grows 20% against FY2026.

Funding trajectory

Project MD28 funding, FY2025–FY2031

Prior years are actuals, the budget year is the request, and the outyears are the FYDP plan. Estimate types are colored and never summed into one figure. Projects carry the full five-year plan; the activities inside them stop at the budget year.

2550059.4FY25ACTUAL55.9FY26ENACTED66.8FY27REQUEST69.9FY2871.5FY2972.4FY3073.0FY31
Actual Enacted Request Outyear (FYDP)
Fiscal YearEstimate TypeAmount ($M)
FY2025Actual59.4
FY2026Enacted55.9
FY2027Request66.8
FY2028Outyear69.9
FY2029Outyear71.5
FY2030Outyear72.4
FY2031Outyear73.0
Inside the project

2 accomplishments / planned programs

The R-2A exhibit. Activities carry the prior, current and budget year only — no five-year plan — and they are descriptive: coverage is partial and they do not always add back to the project, so count them, never total them. Opening lines only here — the full year-by-year narrative is on the project page.

FY2025 actual$39.5M
FY2026 enacted$37.3M
FY2027 request$45.6M

- Define MDA intelligence requirements for IC support of future Missile Defense design, development, test, and deployment. - Update cybersecurity systems engineering policy and guidance for future Missile Defense design and acquisition.

Read the FY2027 plan →
Threat Systems Engineering▲ 14%
FY2025 actual$19.9M
FY2026 enacted$18.6M
FY2027 request$21.2M

Increase from FY 2026 to FY2027 provides for additional threat analysis associated with future Missile Defense development activities to counter evolving adversary capabilities.

Project MD28 — every activity in full →
Who's building it

Named performers on project MD28

Performers named in the R-3 exhibit under this project. Share is of the project's whole FY2027 R-3 total — the same denominator the program-element split uses, so the two read on one scale and will not sum to 100% when unnamed or government work is in the mix. Budget-justification contract funding, not obligations.

SYSTEM HIGH
$13.3M · 20%
Mobius Consulting
$5.0M · 7.5%
JACOBS
$4.5M · 6.7%
SEG (Systems Engineering Group
$3.7M · 5.6%
Project detail

What project MD28 buys

The Intelligence and Security Program provides multi-disciplinary intelligence, security, and engineering for Missile Defense System acquisition, development, test and deployment. The Intelligence and Security Major Program Goals are: - Ensure the Intelligence Community (IC) understands and fulfills the MDA's current and future prioritized intelligence requirements; advocate Missile Defense development and test intelligence requirements. - Leverage available National and Department of War (DoW) Counterintelligence resources. Ensure counterintelligence products and services are fully integrated into all Research, Development, Test, and Evaluation programs and activities to protect classified information and critical technologies and to protect MDA and Missile Defense System personnel, facilities, information and activities. - Provide cross-Agency acquisition security oversight and support for robust acquisition program protection, to include the identification and protection of Critical Program Information. Implement MDA's information security and declassification programs. Strengthen Test and Operations Security across the Agency. Manage Agency regulatory declassification and information security program. Provide physical security policy for Missile Defense System weapon/sensor deployments, including Foreign Military Sales. - Produce threat definitions and model packages, Adversary Data Packages, and Flight Test Target Requirements and Target System Performance Specifications; provide Real World Event analysis. These efforts provide critical information regarding threat missile system capabilities; protection of personnel, activities, and technology from espionage and terrorism; and identification and mitigation of Missile Defense System vulnerabilities.

R-3 lines of work
  • Support
FY2027 Request
$57.1M
▲ 118% vs FY2026
FY2026 Enacted
$26.2M
▲ 0.4% vs FY2025
FY2025 Actual
$26.1M
Prior year

Program-Wide Support — one RDT&E project inside PE 0603890C. Congressional marks are recorded on the program element, not on a project.

Project MD40 — Program-Wide Support — requests $57.1M in FY2027, 3.9% of the $1.46B requested for program element 0603890C. Year over year it grows 118% against FY2026.

Funding trajectory

Project MD40 funding, FY2025–FY2031

Prior years are actuals, the budget year is the request, and the outyears are the FYDP plan. Estimate types are colored and never summed into one figure. Projects carry the full five-year plan; the activities inside them stop at the budget year.

2550026.1FY25ACTUAL26.2FY26ENACTED57.1FY27REQUEST44.7FY2848.8FY2953.0FY3056.6FY31
Actual Enacted Request Outyear (FYDP)
Fiscal YearEstimate TypeAmount ($M)
FY2025Actual26.1
FY2026Enacted26.2
FY2027Request57.1
FY2028Outyear44.7
FY2029Outyear48.8
FY2030Outyear53.0
FY2031Outyear56.6
Inside the project

1 accomplishment / planned program

The R-2A exhibit. Activities carry the prior, current and budget year only — no five-year plan — and they are descriptive: coverage is partial and they do not always add back to the project, so count them, never total them. Opening lines only here — the full year-by-year narrative is on the project page.

Program Wide Support▲ 118%
FY2025 actual$26.1M
FY2026 enacted$26.2M
FY2027 request$57.1M

- Increase from FY 2026 to FY 2027 provides the PWS allocation on a pro-rata basis across multiple Agency PE's each FY based on the total Agency budget and, therefore, fluctuates per PE by FY.

Project MD40 — every activity in full →
Who's building it

Named performers on project MD40

Performers named in the R-3 exhibit under this project. Share is of the project's whole FY2027 R-3 total — the same denominator the program-element split uses, so the two read on one scale and will not sum to 100% when unnamed or government work is in the mix. Budget-justification contract funding, not obligations.

JACOBS
$20.3M · 36%
Project detail

What project MD40 buys

PWS contains non-headquarters management costs in support of Missile Defense Agency (MDA) functions and activities across the entire Missile Defense System. These functions include Government Civilians and Contract Support Services. This effort provides integrity and oversight of the Missile Defense System as well as supports MDA in the development and evaluation of technologies that will respond to the changing threat. Additionally, PWS includes personnel to support global deployments performing deployment site preparation and activation, and provides facility capabilities for MDA Executing Agent locations worldwide. Other MDA wide costs include: physical and technical security; civilian drug testing; audit readiness; the Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) program; legal services and settlements; travel and agency training; office, equipment, vehicle, and warehouse leases; utilities and base operations across multiple geographic locations; commercial and ancillary facility services; management of all facility aspects regardless of lifecycle stage; supplies and maintenance; compliance with statutory environmental requirements; data and unified communications support; materiel and readiness and central property management of equipment; Facilities Sustainment, Restoration and Modernization (FSRM) program (formerly Real Property Maintenance) to keep the Department's inventory of facilities in good working order; and similar operating expenses. PWS is allocated on a pro-rata basis across most Agency PEs and, therefore, fluctuates per PE by FY based on the total Agency budget in that FY.

R-3 lines of work
  • Support
FY2027 Request
$48.8M
▲ 20% vs FY2026
FY2026 Enacted
$40.8M
▼ 13% vs FY2025
FY2025 Actual
$46.7M
Prior year

Enabling - Test — one RDT&E project inside PE 0603890C. Congressional marks are recorded on the program element, not on a project.

Project MT23 — Enabling - Test — requests $48.8M in FY2027, 3.3% of the $1.46B requested for program element 0603890C. Year over year it grows 20% against FY2026.

Funding trajectory

Project MT23 funding, FY2025–FY2031

Prior years are actuals, the budget year is the request, and the outyears are the FYDP plan. Estimate types are colored and never summed into one figure. Projects carry the full five-year plan; the activities inside them stop at the budget year.

2550046.7FY25ACTUAL40.8FY26ENACTED48.8FY27REQUEST49.8FY2850.8FY2951.0FY3051.0FY31
Actual Enacted Request Outyear (FYDP)
Fiscal YearEstimate TypeAmount ($M)
FY2025Actual46.7
FY2026Enacted40.8
FY2027Request48.8
FY2028Outyear49.8
FY2029Outyear50.8
FY2030Outyear51.0
FY2031Outyear51.0
Inside the project

1 accomplishment / planned program

The R-2A exhibit. Activities carry the prior, current and budget year only — no five-year plan — and they are descriptive: coverage is partial and they do not always add back to the project, so count them, never total them. Opening lines only here — the full year-by-year narrative is on the project page.

Engineering and Analysis▲ 20%
FY2025 actual$46.7M
FY2026 enacted$40.8M
FY2027 request$48.8M

Increase from FY 2026 to FY 2027 is aligned with the approved MDA IMTP.

Project MT23 — every activity in full →
Who's building it

Named performers on project MT23

Performers named in the R-3 exhibit under this project. Share is of the project's whole FY2027 R-3 total — the same denominator the program-element split uses, so the two read on one scale and will not sum to 100% when unnamed or government work is in the mix. Budget-justification contract funding, not obligations.

NTSI
$6.4M · 13%
Boeing
$6.3M · 13%
JACOBS
$1.4M · 2.8%
AMENTUM SERVICES
$1.1M · 2.2%
Project detail

What project MT23 buys

The Enabling Test project includes Missile Defense System test planning, execution, and post-test analysis and assessment, and the Modeling & Simulation (M&S) tools and framework required to prepare for and execute ground and flight tests. This includes test design, target requirement definition, and collaboration with the Service Operational Test Agencies (OTA) to incorporate operational test requirements into Missile Defense System events. This ensures Missile Defense System tests collect essential System data and confirm proper System operation. It also provides data to anchor system and element models and simulations for use in simulations to characterize System performance across the battle space, including areas where no live-fire-testing is performed. Resources for the planning, design, execution and management of this testing are provided in accordance with the most current version of the Integrated Master Test Plan (IMTP).

R-3 lines of work
  • Support
  • Test and Evaluation
FY2027 Request
$42.4M
▲ 29% vs FY2026
FY2026 Enacted
$32.8M
▼ 11% vs FY2025
FY2025 Actual
$36.8M
Prior year

Quality, Safety, and Mission Assurance — one RDT&E project inside PE 0603890C. Congressional marks are recorded on the program element, not on a project.

Project MD32 — Quality, Safety, and Mission Assurance — requests $42.4M in FY2027, 2.9% of the $1.46B requested for program element 0603890C. Year over year it grows 29% against FY2026.

Funding trajectory

Project MD32 funding, FY2025–FY2031

Prior years are actuals, the budget year is the request, and the outyears are the FYDP plan. Estimate types are colored and never summed into one figure. Projects carry the full five-year plan; the activities inside them stop at the budget year.

2550036.8FY25ACTUAL32.8FY26ENACTED42.4FY27REQUEST43.4FY2845.6FY2947.7FY3049.8FY31
Actual Enacted Request Outyear (FYDP)
Fiscal YearEstimate TypeAmount ($M)
FY2025Actual36.8
FY2026Enacted32.8
FY2027Request42.4
FY2028Outyear43.4
FY2029Outyear45.6
FY2030Outyear47.7
FY2031Outyear49.8
Inside the project

1 accomplishment / planned program

The R-2A exhibit. Activities carry the prior, current and budget year only — no five-year plan — and they are descriptive: coverage is partial and they do not always add back to the project, so count them, never total them. Opening lines only here — the full year-by-year narrative is on the project page.

Quality, Safety & Mission Assurance▲ 29%
FY2025 actual$36.8M
FY2026 enacted$32.8M
FY2027 request$42.4M

-Expand the MDA supply Chain Tool Suite SCI-DIVE and integrate with CIBAT to provide coordinated supply chain risk analyses. -Utilize tool suite to execute proactive DMSMS risk-based management and inform risk mitigation activities.

Project MD32 — every activity in full →
Who's building it

Named performers on project MD32

Performers named in the R-3 exhibit under this project. Share is of the project's whole FY2027 R-3 total — the same denominator the program-element split uses, so the two read on one scale and will not sum to 100% when unnamed or government work is in the mix. Budget-justification contract funding, not obligations.

AI SOLUTIONS
$8.9M · 21%
NTSI
$1.2M · 2.8%
ARES
$0.8M · 1.8%
JACOBS
$0.6M · 1.4%
Project detail

What project MD32 buys

Quality, Safety, and Mission Assurance ensures that the Missile Defense System and all of its elements are designed, tested and operated in a reliable, safe, and effective manner. Quality and Mission Assurance: Responsible for ensuring the reliable and effective design, test and operation of the Missile Defense System and all of its elements. Develops and ensures implementation of quality and mission assurance requirements. Mitigates quality and mission assurance risks to the lowest practical level. Provides in-plant MDA Assurance Representatives at MDA government and contractor facilities to provide quality and mission assurance oversight of contractor manufacturing and integration. Performs Quality and Mission Assurance Assessments to ensure contractual requirements, internal requirements, and industry best practices are implemented at prime contractor and lower tier suppliers. Reviews and approves all new and modified parts, materials and critical processes for Missile Defense System elements. Assess Missile Defense industrial base and determine critical manufacturing technologies. Conduct assessments of critical component supply base and update critical technologies database. Collaborate with national security space components on investment strategies for critical technologies. Develop and update engineering management tool to characterize supply chain risks. Utilize supply chain risk identification and mitigation tracking system to mitigate manufacturing supply issues for critical components. Utilize tool suite to execute proactive DMSMS risk-based management and inform risk mitigation activities. Safety: Responsible for ensuring the safe design, test and operation of the Missile Defense System and all of its elements. Develops and ensures implementation of safety requirements. Mitigates safety risks to the lowest practical level. Ensures a safe workplace for all MDA employees and contractors by implementing a Safety program. Missile Defense System Safety Officers provide on-site support at the Missile Defense Integration and Operations Center 24 hours a day, 7 days a week for 365 days a year to ensure operational safety of the Missile Defense System.

R-3 lines of work
  • Support
  • Management Services