RDT&E Program Element · President's Budget PB2027

Aegis BMD Test

PE 0604878C·Defense-Wide·Approp. 0400 — RDT&E·BA4 — Advanced Component Development & Prototypes
FY2027 Request
$62.0M
Defense-Wide · RDT&E
HitchAI read

Defense-Wide funding falls 57% to a $62.0M request in FY2027 (down from a FY2026 peak), sustained across the five-year plan. In the FY2027 defense authorization, the House funded it in full; the Senate funded it in full; House appropriators funded it in full. Lockheed Martin leads the industry work, though an unusually large share flows to government labs and warfare centers.

FY2027 Request
$62.0M
▼ 57% vs FY2026
FY2026 Enacted
$143.6M
▲ 26% vs FY2025
FY2025 Actual
$113.9M
Prior year

Roll-up of 2 projects. Projects are the summable leaves — the PE total is their sum, never added to it.

For fiscal year 2027, Defense-Wide agencies are requesting $62.0M for Aegis BMD Test under RDT&E program element 0604878C, down 57% from FY2026.

Funding trajectory

Funding profile, FY2025–FY2031

Prior years are actuals, the budget year is the request, and the outyears are the FYDP plan. Estimate types are colored and never summed into one figure.

2550751001250113.9FY25ACTUAL143.6FY26ENACTED62.0FY27REQUEST106.6FY2869.4FY2969.2FY3070.8FY31
Actual Enacted Request Outyear (FYDP)
Fiscal YearEstimate TypeAmount ($M)
FY2025Actual113.9
FY2026Enacted143.6
FY2027Request62.0
FY2028Outyear106.6
FY2029Outyear69.4
FY2030Outyear69.2
FY2031Outyear70.8
Where it sits

Acquisition lifecycle

This program is funded in RDT&E Budget Activity 4 — Advanced Component Development & Prototypes.

Complete
Research
BA 1–2
Complete
Advanced Technology
BA 3
Current
Prototyping
BA 4
Later
Development & Fielding
BA 5–7
Inside the program element

2 projects roll up into PE 0604878C

Projects are the summable leaves — the PE total is their sum, never added to it. Program elements and projects carry the full five-year plan; activities stop at the budget year. This PE moves -57% overall, which can hide much larger swings below.

Congressional action

Congressional marks

Committee marks on the FY2027 request. Adds and cuts are reconciled in conference before they become law.

RequestPresident's Budget
$62.0M
House NDAA (HASC)HASC
$62.0M full · +$0
Senate NDAA (SASC)SASC
$62.0M full · +$0
House Approps (HAC-D)HAC_D
$62.0M full · +$0
unresolved as of 2026-07-27. These are FY2027 authorization marks (NDAA); appropriations and the conference agreement may differ.
Who's building it

Where the FY2027 request goes

Performers named in the R-3 exhibit, resolved into industry, government-lab, and unspecified shares. Budget-justification contract funding, not obligations.

Lockheed Martin
$4.5M · 7.3%
Aegis BMD Ground Test Execution - LM · CPFF
STRATEGIC ALLIANCE SOLUTIONS
$1.9M · 3.0%
Program Wide Support - Staff Operations - TEAMS Next PPA · CPFF
Where FY2027 funding flowsShare$M
Industry primes14%8.6
Government labs & warfare centers72%44.8
Other / unspecified14%8.5
FY2027 request100%62.0
See Lockheed Martin's full federal contract ledger members
Program detail

Mission & acquisition strategy

The Aegis Based Defense mission is to deliver an enduring, operationally effective and supportable BMD capability to defend the nation, deployed forces, friends and allies, and to increase this capability by delivering evolutionary improvements as part of Missile Defense System upgrades. The Aegis Based Defense element of the Missile Defense System capitalizes upon and evolves from the existing United States (U.S.) Navy Aegis Weapon System and Standard Missile (SM) infrastructures.

The Aegis Based Defense test acquisition strategy allows for the execution of a comprehensive Missile Defense System test program that supports fielding capabilities to the Warfighter. The Aegis Based Defense Test Program utilizes full and open competition to develop, acquire and deliver test planning artifacts, range safety plans, as well as support for the management and conduct of Aegis Based Defense test events in accordance with the MDA Flight and Ground Test IMTP. This includes contract actions to industry, agreements with Department of War organizations, Federally Funded Research and Development Centers, and University Affiliated Research Centers to plan and execute Aegis Based Defense Flight and Ground Test Program.

Project MT09, MD40 — AEGIS BMD Test
  • Support
  • Test and Evaluation
  • Management Services
Ask Hitch

Ask this program element

Answers are generated from the figures on this page — the FY2027 justification exhibits and the marks tracked above — and nothing else is consulted. Confirm any figure against the cited exhibit before you use it externally.

H
Questions this page can answer
How does the FY2027 request compare with FY2026, and what does the five-year plan show?What did the FY2027 NDAA committees do to this request?Which project inside PE 0604878C is growing fastest, and which is shrinking?How is the FY2027 request split between industry and government performers?

This page carries the budget justification and the NDAA marks — nothing else. For what Lockheed Martin has actually been obligated, the ledger is at hitchintel.com/vendors; for live solicitations, hitchintel.com/opportunities. Both are member surfaces.

Provenance

Cite this page

Sources
FY2027 Office of the Secretary of Defense RDT&E Budget Justification · Exhibits R-2 / R-3 · PE 0604878C (President's Budget PB2027) — and FY2027 NDAA committee marks, as tracked 2026-07-27.
Suggested citation
HitchAI, "Aegis BMD Test (PE 0604878C)," federal budget intelligence, PB2027 vintage. hitchintel.com/programs/0604878C
Machine access
Markdown twin /programs/0604878C.md · MCP mcp.hitchintel.combudget_get_program_element, budget_get_cong_marks
FY2027 Request
$59.6M
▼ 57% vs FY2026
FY2026 Enacted
$137.8M
▲ 27% vs FY2025
FY2025 Actual
$108.3M
Prior year

AEGIS BMD Test — one RDT&E project inside PE 0604878C. Congressional marks are recorded on the program element, not on a project.

Project MT09 — AEGIS BMD Test — requests $59.6M in FY2027, 96% of the $62.0M requested for program element 0604878C. Year over year it falls 57% against FY2026.

Funding trajectory

Project MT09 funding, FY2025–FY2031

Prior years are actuals, the budget year is the request, and the outyears are the FYDP plan. Estimate types are colored and never summed into one figure. Projects carry the full five-year plan; the activities inside them stop at the budget year.

2550751001250108.3FY25ACTUAL137.8FY26ENACTED59.6FY27REQUEST103.3FY2867.0FY2966.5FY3067.9FY31
Actual Enacted Request Outyear (FYDP)
Fiscal YearEstimate TypeAmount ($M)
FY2025Actual108.3
FY2026Enacted137.8
FY2027Request59.6
FY2028Outyear103.3
FY2029Outyear67.0
FY2030Outyear66.5
FY2031Outyear67.9
Inside the project

4 accomplishments / planned programs

The R-2A exhibit. Activities carry the prior, current and budget year only — no five-year plan — and they are descriptive: coverage is partial and they do not always add back to the project, so count them, never total them. Opening lines only here — the full year-by-year narrative is on the project page.

Aegis BMD Flight Test Execution▼ 100%
FY2025 actual$60.1M
FY2026 enacted$86.7M
FY2027 request$0.0M

- No funding requested in FY 2027.

Aegis BMD Ground Test Execution▼ 18%
FY2025 actual$17.8M
FY2026 enacted$28.1M
FY2027 request$22.9M

Decrease from FY 2026 to FY 2027 is in accordance with the current IMTP.

Aegis BMD Test Resources▲ 89%
FY2025 actual$22.4M
FY2026 enacted$15.3M
FY2027 request$28.9M

Increase from FY 2026 to FY 2027 is in accordance with the current IMTP.

Test Program Operationsflat
FY2025 actual$8.1M
FY2026 enacted$7.8M
FY2027 request$7.8M

The exhibit describes this work once, for project MT09 as a whole, rather than per activity. Read the project justification →

Project MT09 — every activity in full →
Who's building it

Named performers on project MT09

Performers named in the R-3 exhibit under this project. Share is of the project's whole FY2027 R-3 total — the same denominator the program-element split uses, so the two read on one scale and will not sum to 100% when unnamed or government work is in the mix. Budget-justification contract funding, not obligations.

Lockheed Martin
$4.5M · 7.5%
NAWC/PM
$1.5M · 2.5%
MDA
$0.6M · 1.1%
Project detail

What project MT09 buys

The Aegis BMD Test program element is responsible for the planning, design, and execution of developmental and operational flight, ground, and cybersecurity testing of Aegis Based Defense hardware and software to characterize and validate joint deployable Missile Defense and Navy Integrated Air and Missile Defense capability to counter the allocated threats and ensure that these capabilities are operationally effective, suitable, and survivable upon transfer to the warfighter. Aegis Based Defense hardware and software are integrated into existing Aegis Weapon System baselines, Standard Missile (SM)-3 interceptor, and Navy's SM-6 interceptor. MDA works with the Director of Operational Test and Evaluation, the Navy's Operational Test and Evaluation Force, industry partners, and the Navy Warfare Centers in the designing, planning, safety, readiness, execution, data collection, pre-mission and post-mission analysis, and reporting. The system pre-flight predictions provide confidence in test execution by predicting element performance and exercising element interfaces. The system post-flight reconstruction replicates the Missile Defense System configuration, actual environmental conditions, and target dynamics observed in flight to anchor Modeling and Simulation (M&S) results. Aegis BMD participation in Hardware-in-the-Loop and integrated MDA level ground tests supports the operational capability fielding decisions.

R-3 lines of work
  • Support
  • Test and Evaluation
  • Management Services
FY2027 Request
$2.3M
▼ 59% vs FY2026
FY2026 Enacted
$5.8M
▲ 3.4% vs FY2025
FY2025 Actual
$5.6M
Prior year

Program Wide Support — one RDT&E project inside PE 0604878C. Congressional marks are recorded on the program element, not on a project.

Project MD40 — Program Wide Support — requests $2.3M in FY2027, 3.8% of the $62.0M requested for program element 0604878C. Year over year it falls 59% against FY2026.

Funding trajectory

Project MD40 funding, FY2025–FY2031

Prior years are actuals, the budget year is the request, and the outyears are the FYDP plan. Estimate types are colored and never summed into one figure. Projects carry the full five-year plan; the activities inside them stop at the budget year.

05.6FY25ACTUAL5.8FY26ENACTED2.3FY27REQUEST3.3FY282.5FY292.7FY302.9FY31
Actual Enacted Request Outyear (FYDP)
Fiscal YearEstimate TypeAmount ($M)
FY2025Actual5.6
FY2026Enacted5.8
FY2027Request2.3
FY2028Outyear3.3
FY2029Outyear2.5
FY2030Outyear2.7
FY2031Outyear2.9
Inside the project

1 accomplishment / planned program

The R-2A exhibit. Activities carry the prior, current and budget year only — no five-year plan — and they are descriptive: coverage is partial and they do not always add back to the project, so count them, never total them.

Program Wide Support▼ 59%
FY2025 actual$5.6M
FY2026 enacted$5.8M
FY2027 request$2.3M

FY2026 to FY2027 change - Decrease from FY 2026 to FY 2027 reflects the PWS allocation on a pro-rata basis across multiple Agency PEs each FY based on the total Agency budget and, therefore, fluctuates per PE by FY.

Who's building it

Named performers on project MD40

Performers named in the R-3 exhibit under this project. Share is of the project's whole FY2027 R-3 total — the same denominator the program-element split uses, so the two read on one scale and will not sum to 100% when unnamed or government work is in the mix. Budget-justification contract funding, not obligations.

STRATEGIC ALLIANCE SOLUTIONS
$1.9M · 79%
CACI
$0.1M · 5.3%
Project detail

What project MD40 buys

PWS contains non-headquarters management costs in support of Missile Defense Agency (MDA) functions and activities across the entire Missile Defense System. These functions include Government Civilians and Contract Support Services. This effort provides integrity and oversight of the Missile Defense System as well as supports MDA in the development and evaluation of technologies that will respond to the changing threat. Additionally, PWS includes personnel to support global deployments performing deployment site preparation and activation, and provides facility capabilities for MDA Executing Agent locations worldwide. Other MDA wide costs include: physical and technical security; civilian drug testing; audit readiness; the Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) program; legal services and settlements; travel and agency training; office, equipment, vehicle, and warehouse leases; utilities and base operations across multiple geographic locations; commercial and ancillary facility services; management of all facility aspects regardless of lifecycle stage; supplies and maintenance; compliance with statutory environmental requirements; data and unified communications support; materiel and readiness and central property management of equipment; Facilities Sustainment, Restoration and Modernization (FSRM) program (formerly Real Property Maintenance) to keep the Department's inventory of facilities in good working order; and similar operating expenses. PWS is allocated on a pro-rata basis across most Agency PEs; therefore, fluctuates per PE by FY based on the total Agency budget in that FY.

R-3 lines of work
  • Support
  • Management Services