RDT&E Program Element · President's Budget PB2027

Hypersonic Defense

PE 0604181C·Defense-Wide·Approp. 0400 — RDT&E·BA4 — Advanced Component Development & Prototypes
FY2027 Request
$213.8M
Defense-Wide · RDT&E
HitchAI read

Defense-Wide funding ramps 17% to a $213.8M request in FY2027, sustained across the five-year plan. In the FY2027 defense authorization, the House added 23% (to $263.8M); the Senate funded it in full; House appropriators funded it in full. Lockheed Martin leads the industry work, though an unusually large share flows to government labs and warfare centers.

FY2027 Request
$213.8M
▲ 17% vs FY2026
FY2026 Enacted
$183.0M
▲ 4.0% vs FY2025
FY2025 Actual
$175.9M
Prior year

Roll-up of 2 projects. Projects are the summable leaves — the PE total is their sum, never added to it.

For fiscal year 2027, Defense-Wide agencies are requesting $213.8M for Hypersonic Defense under RDT&E program element 0604181C, up 17% over FY2026.

Funding trajectory

Funding profile, FY2025–FY2031

Prior years are actuals, the budget year is the request, and the outyears are the FYDP plan. Estimate types are colored and never summed into one figure.

1002003004000175.9FY25ACTUAL183.0FY26ENACTED213.8FY27REQUEST248.8FY28332.9FY29392.8FY30393.9FY31
Actual Enacted Request Outyear (FYDP)
Fiscal YearEstimate TypeAmount ($M)
FY2025Actual175.9
FY2026Enacted183.0
FY2027Request213.8
FY2028Outyear248.8
FY2029Outyear332.9
FY2030Outyear392.8
FY2031Outyear393.9
Where it sits

Acquisition lifecycle

This program is funded in RDT&E Budget Activity 4 — Advanced Component Development & Prototypes.

Complete
Research
BA 1–2
Complete
Advanced Technology
BA 3
Current
Prototyping
BA 4
Later
Development & Fielding
BA 5–7
Inside the program element

2 projects roll up into PE 0604181C

Projects are the summable leaves — the PE total is their sum, never added to it. Program elements and projects carry the full five-year plan; activities stop at the budget year. This PE moves 17% overall, which can hide much larger swings below.

Congressional action

Congressional marks

Committee marks on the FY2027 request. Adds and cuts are reconciled in conference before they become law.

RequestPresident's Budget
$213.8M
House NDAA (HASC)HASC
$263.8M +$50.0M · +23%
Senate NDAA (SASC)SASC
$213.8M full · +$0
House Approps (HAC-D)HAC_D
$213.8M full · +$0
▲ $50.0M chamber gap — unresolved as of 2026-07-27. These are FY2027 authorization marks (NDAA); appropriations and the conference agreement may differ.
Who's building it

Where the FY2027 request goes

Performers named in the R-3 exhibit, resolved into industry, government-lab, and unspecified shares. Budget-justification contract funding, not obligations.

Lockheed Martin
$88.7M · 41%
Hypersonic Missile Defense Capability - Hypersonic Missile Defense - (LM) · CPAF
Northrop Grumman
$25.3M · 12%
Hypersonic Missile Defense Capability - Hypersonic Missile Defense - (NG) · CPAF
Where FY2027 funding flowsShare$M
Industry primes59%125.9
Government labs & warfare centers34%72.6
Other / unspecified7.1%15.3
FY2027 request100%213.8
See Lockheed Martin's full federal contract ledger members
Program detail

Mission & acquisition strategy

Strategic competitors and both homeland and regional adversaries are heavily investing in offensive and defensive hypersonic capabilities, and currently have operational hypersonic strike and defensive systems deployed. These are challenging realities of the emerging missile threat environment that U.S. Missile Defense policy, strategy, and capabilities must address. These adversaries continue to expand the capability and capacity of their offensive and defensive hypersonic missile inventories for both strategic and regional hypersonic missiles. Near-Peer/Peer nations have also demonstrated hypersonic missiles in recent flight tests.

To optimize Missile Defense System performance, MDA leverages the nation's engineering centers of excellence at government agencies, military services, Federally Funded Research and Development Centers, University Affiliated Research Centers and industries. The executing agents use varying contracting strategies in a flexible manner to maximize their contribution to the Missile Defense System. MDA acquires products and services by competitive means to the extent that is possible, practical, and uses the Advanced Technology Broad Agency Announcement process to award concept definition contracts.

Project MD29, MD40 — Hypersonic Defense
  • Product Development
  • Support
  • Test and Evaluation
Ask Hitch

Ask this program element

Answers are generated from the figures on this page — the FY2027 justification exhibits and the marks tracked above — and nothing else is consulted. Confirm any figure against the cited exhibit before you use it externally.

H
Questions this page can answer
How does the FY2027 request compare with FY2026, and what does the five-year plan show?What did the FY2027 NDAA committees do to this request?Which project inside PE 0604181C is growing fastest, and which is shrinking?How is the FY2027 request split between industry and government performers?

This page carries the budget justification and the NDAA marks — nothing else. For what Lockheed Martin has actually been obligated, the ledger is at hitchintel.com/vendors; for live solicitations, hitchintel.com/opportunities. Both are member surfaces.

Provenance

Cite this page

Sources
FY2027 Office of the Secretary of Defense RDT&E Budget Justification · Exhibits R-2 / R-3 · PE 0604181C (President's Budget PB2027) — and FY2027 NDAA committee marks, as tracked 2026-07-27.
Suggested citation
HitchAI, "Hypersonic Defense (PE 0604181C)," federal budget intelligence, PB2027 vintage. hitchintel.com/programs/0604181C
Machine access
Markdown twin /programs/0604181C.md · MCP mcp.hitchintel.combudget_get_program_element, budget_get_cong_marks
FY2027 Request
$205.7M
▲ 23% vs FY2026
FY2026 Enacted
$167.5M
▼ 0.7% vs FY2025
FY2025 Actual
$168.8M
Prior year

Hypersonic Defense — one RDT&E project inside PE 0604181C. Congressional marks are recorded on the program element, not on a project.

Project MD29 — Hypersonic Defense — requests $205.7M in FY2027, 96% of the $213.8M requested for program element 0604181C. Year over year it grows 23% against FY2026.

Funding trajectory

Project MD29 funding, FY2025–FY2031

Prior years are actuals, the budget year is the request, and the outyears are the FYDP plan. Estimate types are colored and never summed into one figure. Projects carry the full five-year plan; the activities inside them stop at the budget year.

1002003000168.8FY25ACTUAL167.5FY26ENACTED205.7FY27REQUEST241.1FY28321.1FY29377.4FY30377.7FY31
Actual Enacted Request Outyear (FYDP)
Fiscal YearEstimate TypeAmount ($M)
FY2025Actual168.8
FY2026Enacted167.5
FY2027Request205.7
FY2028Outyear241.1
FY2029Outyear321.1
FY2030Outyear377.4
FY2031Outyear377.7
Inside the project

2 accomplishments / planned programs

The R-2A exhibit. Activities carry the prior, current and budget year only — no five-year plan — and they are descriptive: coverage is partial and they do not always add back to the project, so count them, never total them. Opening lines only here — the full year-by-year narrative is on the project page.

Regional Hypersonic Missile Defense Capability▼ 100%
FY2025 actual$168.8M
FY2026 enacted$167.5M
FY2027 request$0.0M

Aegis Weapon System: - Evolve and mature systems engineering efforts to continue the flow of system level requirements to subsystem requirement specifications and continue preliminary design activities. - Develop updated weapon system code to support demonstration of capability in partner flight tests and flight experiments and leverage…

FY2025 actual$0.0M
FY2026 enacted$0.0M
FY2027 request$205.7M

Leverage and Upgrade Existing Systems: - Continue engineering, planning, and foundational upgrades to land and sea-based capability to support acceleration of regional and homeland Aegis Glide Phase Interceptor capability. - Provide BOA and C2BMC algorithm development and prototyping for low latency tracks as foundational efforts to…

Read the FY2027 plan →
Project MD29 — every activity in full →
Who's building it

Named performers on project MD29

Performers named in the R-3 exhibit under this project. Share is of the project's whole FY2027 R-3 total — the same denominator the program-element split uses, so the two read on one scale and will not sum to 100% when unnamed or government work is in the mix. Budget-justification contract funding, not obligations.

Lockheed Martin
$88.7M · 43%
Northrop Grumman
$25.3M · 12%
MODERN
$3.0M · 1.5%
Program Executive Office (PEO) Integrate
$2.3M · 1.1%
Project detail

What project MD29 buys

Strategic competitors and both homeland and regional adversaries are heavily investing in hypersonics, both offense and defense, and currently have operational hypersonic strike and defensive systems deployed. These are challenging realities of the emerging missile threat environment that United States Missile Defense policy, strategy, and capabilities must address. These adversaries continue to expand the capability and capacity of their offensive and defensive hypersonic missile inventories for both strategic and regional hypersonic missiles. Near Peer/Peer nations have also demonstrated hypersonic missiles in flight tests. The Hypersonic Defense program element includes executing systems engineering activities, upgrading existing systems, investing in new technologies and maturation, and developing new regional and homeland defensive capabilities. Missile Defense Agency's (MDA) counter hypersonic threats strategy includes leveraging existing systems, delivering an initial regional and homeland layered defense capability, and increasing defense capabilities in the future. Activities enabling this strategy are the following: - Develop a land and sea-based Glide Phase Intercept capability to engage hypersonic threats during the glide phase of flight and other threats of multi-mission areas. - Develop requirements to integrate Glide Phase Intercept capability into the Missile Defense System-Next capabilities in support of the President's Executive Order 14186. - Execute systems engineering for Hypersonic Defense, including architecture analysis, technology prioritization, requirements development, planning, and analysis. - Partner with the Services and other agencies to leverage land and sea-based work on common technologies, test infrastructure, weapon development, testing, and war-gaming. - Cooperatively develop the Glide Phase Interceptor with Japan.

R-3 lines of work
  • Product Development
  • Support
  • Test and Evaluation
FY2027 Request
$8.1M
▼ 48% vs FY2026
FY2026 Enacted
$15.5M
▲ 117% vs FY2025
FY2025 Actual
$7.1M
Prior year

Program Wide Support — one RDT&E project inside PE 0604181C. Congressional marks are recorded on the program element, not on a project.

Project MD40 — Program Wide Support — requests $8.1M in FY2027, 3.8% of the $213.8M requested for program element 0604181C. Year over year it falls 48% against FY2026.

Funding trajectory

Project MD40 funding, FY2025–FY2031

Prior years are actuals, the budget year is the request, and the outyears are the FYDP plan. Estimate types are colored and never summed into one figure. Projects carry the full five-year plan; the activities inside them stop at the budget year.

07.1FY25ACTUAL15.5FY26ENACTED8.1FY27REQUEST7.7FY2811.8FY2915.4FY3016.2FY31
Actual Enacted Request Outyear (FYDP)
Fiscal YearEstimate TypeAmount ($M)
FY2025Actual7.1
FY2026Enacted15.5
FY2027Request8.1
FY2028Outyear7.7
FY2029Outyear11.8
FY2030Outyear15.4
FY2031Outyear16.2
Inside the project

1 accomplishment / planned program

The R-2A exhibit. Activities carry the prior, current and budget year only — no five-year plan — and they are descriptive: coverage is partial and they do not always add back to the project, so count them, never total them.

Program Wide Support▼ 48%
FY2025 actual$7.1M
FY2026 enacted$15.5M
FY2027 request$8.1M

FY2026 to FY2027 change - Decrease from FY 2026 to FY 2027 reflects the PWS allocation on a pro-rata basis across multiple Agency PEs each FY based on the total Agency budget and, therefore, fluctuates per PE by FY.

Who's building it

Named performers on project MD40

Performers named in the R-3 exhibit under this project. Share is of the project's whole FY2027 R-3 total — the same denominator the program-element split uses, so the two read on one scale and will not sum to 100% when unnamed or government work is in the mix. Budget-justification contract funding, not obligations.

INTREPID, L.L.C
$4.6M · 56%
SYSTEMS ENGINEERING
$1.5M · 18%
Project detail

What project MD40 buys

PWS contains non-headquarters management costs in support of Missile Defense Agency (MDA) functions and activities across the entire Missile Defense System. These functions include Government Civilians and Contract Support Services. This effort provides integrity and oversight of the Missile Defense System as well as supports MDA in the development and evaluation of technologies that will respond to the changing threat. Additionally, PWS includes personnel to support global deployments performing deployment site preparation and activation, and provides facility capabilities for MDA Executing Agent locations worldwide. Other MDA wide costs include: physical and technical security; civilian drug testing; audit readiness; the Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) program; legal services and settlements; travel and agency training; office, equipment, vehicle, and warehouse leases; utilities and base operations across multiple geographic locations; commercial and ancillary facility services; management of all facility aspects regardless of lifecycle stage; supplies and maintenance; compliance with statutory environmental requirements; data and unified communications support; materiel and readiness and central property management of equipment; Facilities Sustainment, Restoration and Modernization (FSRM) program (formerly Real Property Maintenance) to keep the Department's inventory of facilities in good working order; and similar operating expenses. PWS is allocated on a pro-rata basis across most Agency PEs and, therefore, fluctuates per PE by FY based on the total Agency budget in that FY.

R-3 lines of work
  • Support
  • Management Services