RDT&E Program Element · President's Budget PB2027

Advanced Surface Machinery Sys

PE 0603573N·U.S. Navy·Approp. 1319 — RDT&E·BA4 — Advanced Component Development & Prototypes
FY2027 Request
$270.0M
◆ Scaling +80%
HitchAI read

U.S. Navy funding ramps 80% to a $270.0M request in FY2027, sustained across the five-year plan. In the FY2027 defense authorization, the House added 1.9% (to $275.0M); the Senate funded it in full; House appropriators added 8.3% (to $292.5M). Industry leads the industry work.

FY2027 Request
$270.0M
▲ 80% vs FY2026
FY2026 Enacted
$150.3M
▲ 86% vs FY2025
FY2025 Actual
$81.0M
Prior year

Roll-up of 3 projects. Projects are the summable leaves — the PE total is their sum, never added to it.

For fiscal year 2027, the U.S. Navy is requesting $270.0M for Advanced Surface Machinery Sys under RDT&E program element 0603573N, up 80% over FY2026.

Funding trajectory

Funding profile, FY2025–FY2031

Prior years are actuals, the budget year is the request, and the outyears are the FYDP plan. Estimate types are colored and never summed into one figure.

100200300081.0FY25ACTUAL150.3FY26ENACTED270.0FY27REQUEST242.8FY28268.6FY29371.8FY30369.1FY31
Actual Enacted Request Outyear (FYDP)
Fiscal YearEstimate TypeAmount ($M)
FY2025Actual81.0
FY2026Enacted150.3
FY2027Request270.0
FY2028Outyear242.8
FY2029Outyear268.6
FY2030Outyear371.8
FY2031Outyear369.1
Where it sits

Acquisition lifecycle

This program is funded in RDT&E Budget Activity 4 — Advanced Component Development & Prototypes.

Complete
Research
BA 1–2
Complete
Advanced Technology
BA 3
Current
Prototyping
BA 4
Later
Development & Fielding
BA 5–7
Inside the program element

3 projects roll up into PE 0603573N

Projects are the summable leaves — the PE total is their sum, never added to it. Program elements and projects carry the full five-year plan; activities stop at the budget year. This PE moves 80% overall, which can hide much larger swings below.

Congressional action

Congressional marks

Committee marks on the FY2027 request. Adds and cuts are reconciled in conference before they become law.

RequestPresident's Budget
$270.0M
House NDAA (HASC)HASC
$275.0M +$5.0M · +1.9%
Senate NDAA (SASC)SASC
$270.0M full · +$0
House Approps (HAC-D)HAC_D
$292.5M +$22.5M · +8.3%
▲ $22.5M chamber gap — unresolved as of 2026-07-27. These are FY2027 authorization marks (NDAA); appropriations and the conference agreement may differ.
Who's building it

Where the FY2027 request goes

Performers named in the R-3 exhibit, resolved into industry, government-lab, and unspecified shares. Budget-justification contract funding, not obligations.

Industry
$98.0M · 36%
Power & Energy Sys · CPFF
Other Gov't Agencies
$52.0M · 19%
BBG(X) P&P RMD
Where FY2027 funding flowsShare$M
Industry primes78%210.0
Government labs & warfare centers22%60.0
FY2027 request100%270.0
See Industry's full federal contract ledger members
Program detail

Mission & acquisition strategy

The Guided Missile Battleship (BBG(X)) program supports the expansion and modernization of the Nation's large surface combatant fleet, reinforcing maritime dominance. The Battleship is based on the validated requirement for high-end surface capability directly supporting the Navy Warfighting Concept (NWC) and Expanded Maritime Maneuver (EMM) that cannot be met by current fleet assets. Adding capability at the highest end of the Golden Fleet high-low mix, the Battleship's primary role is to deliver high-volume, long-range offensive fires and serve as a robust, survivable forward command and control platform.

To execute its design activities, the BBG(X) program employs a multi-disciplinary national collaborative team composed of ship design agents, shipbuilders, suppliers, and other experts. As the program advances in 2026, a primary focus will be executing a two-pronged strategy to mature its acquisition and contracting approach. First, in the fourth quarter, we will transition the current DDG(X) design contracts to full BBG(X) contracts, solidifying our acquisition framework. Second, in parallel, the program will seek comprehensive build strategies from our shipbuilding partners.

Project 2486, 2471, 9999 — BBG(X) Integrated Power Systems
  • Product Development
  • Management Services
Ask Hitch

Ask this program element

Answers are generated from the figures on this page — the FY2027 justification exhibits and the marks tracked above — and nothing else is consulted. Confirm any figure against the cited exhibit before you use it externally.

H
Questions this page can answer
How does the FY2027 request compare with FY2026, and what does the five-year plan show?What did the FY2027 NDAA committees do to this request?Which project inside PE 0603573N is growing fastest, and which is shrinking?How is the FY2027 request split between industry and government performers?

This page carries the budget justification and the NDAA marks — nothing else. For what Industry has actually been obligated, the ledger is at hitchintel.com/vendors; for live solicitations, hitchintel.com/opportunities. Both are member surfaces.

Provenance

Cite this page

Sources
FY2027 Department of the Navy RDT&E Budget Justification · Exhibits R-2 / R-3 · PE 0603573N (President's Budget PB2027) — and FY2027 NDAA committee marks, as tracked 2026-07-27.
Suggested citation
HitchAI, "Advanced Surface Machinery Sys (PE 0603573N)," federal budget intelligence, PB2027 vintage. hitchintel.com/programs/0603573N
Machine access
Markdown twin /programs/0603573N.md · MCP mcp.hitchintel.combudget_get_program_element, budget_get_cong_marks
FY2027 Request
$251.0M
No FY2026 funding
FY2026 Enacted
$0.0M
No FY2025 funding
FY2025 Actual
$0.0M
Prior year

BBG(X) Integrated Power Systems — one RDT&E project inside PE 0603573N. Congressional marks are recorded on the program element, not on a project.

Project 2486 — BBG(X) Integrated Power Systems — requests $251.0M in FY2027, 93% of the $270.0M requested for program element 0603573N. It is a new start — no prior-year or current-year money.

Funding trajectory

Project 2486 funding, FY2025–FY2031

Prior years are actuals, the budget year is the request, and the outyears are the FYDP plan. Estimate types are colored and never summed into one figure. Projects carry the full five-year plan; the activities inside them stop at the budget year.

10020030000.0FY25ACTUAL0.0FY26ENACTED251.0FY27REQUEST224.0FY28249.5FY29352.2FY30349.2FY31
Actual Enacted Request Outyear (FYDP)
Fiscal YearEstimate TypeAmount ($M)
FY2025Actual0.0
FY2026Enacted0.0
FY2027Request251.0
FY2028Outyear224.0
FY2029Outyear249.5
FY2030Outyear352.2
FY2031Outyear349.2
Inside the project

1 accomplishment / planned program

The R-2A exhibit. Activities carry the prior, current and budget year only — no five-year plan — and they are descriptive: coverage is partial and they do not always add back to the project, so count them, never total them. Opening lines only here — the full year-by-year narrative is on the project page.

FY2025 actual$0.0M
FY2026 enacted$0.0M
FY2027 request$251.0M

Continue BBG(X) power and propulsion risk reduction activities for land-based testing of propulsion systems in a realistic environment aligned with the BBG(X) IPS design efforts as part of BBG(X) Design Development efforts executed under PE 0603564N/ PU 0413. BBG(X) Power and Propulsion System Strategy completes design, test…

Read the FY2027 plan →
Project 2486 — every activity in full →
Who's building it

Named performers on project 2486

Performers named in the R-3 exhibit under this project. Share is of the project's whole FY2027 R-3 total — the same denominator the program-element split uses, so the two read on one scale and will not sum to 100% when unnamed or government work is in the mix. Budget-justification contract funding, not obligations.

Industry
$90.6M · 36%
Other Gov't Agencies
$52.0M · 21%
Gibbs & Cox
$29.6M · 12%
Shipbuilders
$25.2M · 10%
Project detail

What project 2486 buys

The Guided Missile Battleship (BBG(X)) program supports the expansion and modernization of the Nation's large surface combatant fleet, reinforcing maritime dominance. The Battleship is based on the validated requirement for high-end surface capability directly supporting the Navy Warfighting Concept (NWC) and Expanded Maritime Maneuver (EMM) that cannot be met by current fleet assets. Adding capability at the highest end of the Golden Fleet high-low mix, the Battleship's primary role is to deliver high-volume, long-range offensive fires and serve as a robust, survivable forward command and control platform. The expanded size and energy density of the new Battleship provide critical advantages for future naval warfare, offering a future-proof platform with distinct capabilities that enhance deterrence. Its advanced systems will enable true long-range strike with hypersonic weapons housed in new, larger vertical launch systems. Vastly increased power generation, managed by a sophisticated integrated power system with high-capacity energy storage, will support mission-critical directed energy weapons like high-output lasers and electromagnetic railguns, reducing reliance on costly single-use munitions. Furthermore, its advanced naval gunfire offers cost-effective options for strike and defense, and its capacity to embark a fleet command staff enhances survivability by putting commanders closer to the fight. As a flexible command-and-control platform for both manned and unmanned platforms, the Battleship can lead a Surface Action Group, integrate with a Carrier Strike Group, or operate autonomously to secure critical sea lanes. To overcome the capacity limits of the Arleigh Burke-class destroyer and the capability compromises of the planned DDG(X), the Battleship is designed specifically to accommodate these advanced weapon systems. The ship's architecture provides the foundational space, weight, power, and cooling for five large weapon stations, enabling the integration of large-format missile launchers, railguns, and high-energy lasers that cannot be incorporated within legacy platforms. The design ensures room for future technological advancements and sends an unmistakable signal of American resolve, inspiring confidence in allies and fear in adversaries.

R-3 lines of work
  • Product Development
  • Management Services
FY2027 Request
$19.0M
▼ 81% vs FY2026
FY2026 Enacted
$101.1M
▲ 33% vs FY2025
FY2025 Actual
$76.1M
Prior year

Integrated Power Systems (IPS) — one RDT&E project inside PE 0603573N. Congressional marks are recorded on the program element, not on a project.

Project 2471 — Integrated Power Systems (IPS) — requests $19.0M in FY2027, 7.0% of the $270.0M requested for program element 0603573N. Year over year it falls 81% against FY2026.

Funding trajectory

Project 2471 funding, FY2025–FY2031

Prior years are actuals, the budget year is the request, and the outyears are the FYDP plan. Estimate types are colored and never summed into one figure. Projects carry the full five-year plan; the activities inside them stop at the budget year.

255075100076.1FY25ACTUAL101.1FY26ENACTED19.0FY27REQUEST18.8FY2819.1FY2919.5FY3019.9FY31
Actual Enacted Request Outyear (FYDP)
Fiscal YearEstimate TypeAmount ($M)
FY2025Actual76.1
FY2026Enacted101.1
FY2027Request19.0
FY2028Outyear18.8
FY2029Outyear19.1
FY2030Outyear19.5
FY2031Outyear19.9
Inside the project

3 accomplishments / planned programs

The R-2A exhibit. Activities carry the prior, current and budget year only — no five-year plan — and they are descriptive: coverage is partial and they do not always add back to the project, so count them, never total them. Opening lines only here — the full year-by-year narrative is on the project page.

DDG (X) Power & Propulsion Risk Mitigation & Demonstration▼ 100%
FY2025 actual$57.5M
FY2026 enacted$81.9M
FY2027 request$0.0M

FY2026 all DDG(X) Integrated Power Systems (IPS), design development, and power and propulsion risk reduction activities will be updated to the BBG(X) requirements. DDG(X) plans and products are being modified to aligned with the BBG(X) IPS design efforts as part of BBG(X) Design Development efforts executed under PE 0603564N/ PU 0411…

FY2025 actual$16.7M
FY2026 enacted$17.2M
FY2027 request$16.8M

Energy Magazine (EM): Complete manufacturing and system integration of the Energy Magazine Baseline First Article. Complete formal Test Readiness Review and begin First Article Testing of the Energy Magazine Baseline First Article, complete characterization for Lithium Ion (Li) Batteries in accordance with NAVSEA manual S9310-AQ-SAF-010…

Read the FY2027 plan →
HM&E Cyber Analysis▲ 8%
FY2025 actual$1.9M
FY2026 enacted$2.0M
FY2027 request$2.2M

Conduct additional Cyber Tabletop type events and cyber vulnerability analysis via Model Based Systems Engineering tools of HM&E systems/networks on additional ship classes. Investigate a commercial cyber capability for Programmable Logic Controllers (PLCs) to determine if it can be used to monitor PLCs in HM&E networks. Continue HM&E…

Project 2471 — every activity in full →
Who's building it

Named performers on project 2471

Performers named in the R-3 exhibit under this project. Share is of the project's whole FY2027 R-3 total — the same denominator the program-element split uses, so the two read on one scale and will not sum to 100% when unnamed or government work is in the mix. Budget-justification contract funding, not obligations.

Industry
$7.4M · 39%
DRS
$5.1M · 27%
Project detail

What project 2471 buys

This Project Unit includes the development and risk reduction of advanced surface ship Hull, Mechanical, and Electrical (HM&E) components and systems, power and energy systems, and for all future ships and back-fit ships where appropriate HM&E cyber security. Specific sub-projects include: Prior to FY 2026, the DDG(X) power and propulsion risk mitigation demonstration sub-project was used to de-risk the DDG(X) Integrated Power System (IPS) and satisfy the FY 2020 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) Section 131 requirements for land based testing of propulsion systems in a realistic environment and FY 2022 NDAA Section 221 requirement for a land based test program for the engineering plant prior to DDG(X) construction start. The DDG(X) hardware development and procurement and land-based testing efforts executed under this PE were informed by DDG(X) Ship Design specifications developed under PE 0603564N / PU 0411. In FY 2026, the DDG(X) efforts are being modified to meet the BBG(X) requirements and will be reflected in FY 2027 under PU 2486. Naval Power and Energy Systems developments and transitions including power generation, power conversion, power distribution, energy storage, power utilization and automation and control functions for fully integrated electric propulsion (such as T-AKE -1 class or DDG 1000 class), hybrid electric propulsion (such as LHD 8 and LHA(R) class), as well as legacy mechanical propulsion ships (such as DDG 51 class). Naval Power and Energy Systems sub-project supports optimized integration of naval warship power and energy systems to support Directed Energy (DE) and other high powered mission systems, ship power quality requirements including frequency and voltage control for AC systems, DE and other high powered mission systems, appropriate component and system controls, integration of components and systems into future and current ships, and providing power and energy system solution alternatives to new and existing platforms. Existing ships' power systems require optimized integration via energy storage and advanced controls techniques to withstand the effects of DE and other high powered mission systems and avoid negative impacts to power generating equipment (diesel/gas turbine generators).

R-3 lines of work
  • Product Development
  • Test and Evaluation
  • Management Services
FY2027 Request
$0.0M
▼ 100% vs FY2026
FY2026 Enacted
$49.2M
▲ 920% vs FY2025
FY2025 Actual
$4.8M
Prior year

Congressional Adds — one RDT&E project inside PE 0603573N. Congressional marks are recorded on the program element, not on a project.

Project 9999 — Congressional Adds — requests $0.0M in FY2027, 0.0% of the $270.0M requested for program element 0603573N. Year over year it falls 100% against FY2026.

Funding trajectory

Project 9999 funding, FY2025–FY2031

Prior years are actuals, the budget year is the request, and the outyears are the FYDP plan. Estimate types are colored and never summed into one figure. Projects carry the full five-year plan; the activities inside them stop at the budget year.

255004.8FY25ACTUAL49.2FY26ENACTED0.0FY27REQUEST0.0FY280.0FY290.0FY300.0FY31
Actual Enacted Request Outyear (FYDP)
Fiscal YearEstimate TypeAmount ($M)
FY2025Actual4.8
FY2026Enacted49.2
FY2027Request0.0
FY2028Outyear0.0
FY2029Outyear0.0
FY2030Outyear0.0
FY2031Outyear0.0
Project detail

What project 9999 buys

C332 Silicon Carbide Power Electronics & System Integration: The proposed effort is to develop a prototype demonstrator of a SiC-enabled hybrid modular multilevel converter (HMMC-SiC) that is targeted for high power and medium voltage power system applications in particular for ship propulsion and ship integrated power systems. The development will focus on generating key sub-assemblies such as the full-bridge submodules (SMs) with SiC MOSFETs (SMs-SiC) and SMs with silicon IGBTs (SMs-Si) with a focus on SMs-SiC, and the medium voltage IGBT semiconductor switches (MVSS) assemblies. These building block assemblies (SMs and MVSS) include the semiconductors and their peripherals such as gate drivers, power supplies, protection, capacitors etc. Further we will integrate these elements into a working and demonstratable system in commercial or custom packaging with dedicated hardware such as the arm inductors, bus work, controllers etc. This will mature and elevate the technology readiness level (TRL) propose this converter topology for near- and mid-term US Navy ship propulsion and power system applications. CA21 Silicon Carbide Semiconductors: The focus of this project is the design, development, and testing of silicon carbide (SiC) semiconductor devices. The primary objectives are to achieve a reduction in the physical size of the components and an increase in their switching frequency capabilities. This involves leveraging the superior material properties of SiC, such as its higher breakdown voltage and thermal conductivity, which allow for more compact and efficient power electronic systems. The faster switching speeds of SiC transistors lead to smaller passive components, further reducing the total size of the drive/converter. The design and testing process will validate the performance and reliability of these next-generation SiC devices for high-power applications. CA22 Integrated Silicon Carbine Bi-Directional Power Converter: This advanced technology provides wide-bandgap properties which enable power conversion systems with higher power density, allowing for reduced size and weight while delivering higher efficiency.

R-3 lines of work
  • Product Development