RDT&E Program Element · President's Budget PB2027

Ballistic Missile Defense Command and Control, Battle Management & Communication

PE 0603896C·Defense-Wide·Approp. 0400 — RDT&E·BA4 — Advanced Component Development & Prototypes
FY2027 Request
$940.0M
⚑ Contested — House approps cuts 2.9%
HitchAI read

Defense-Wide funding ramps 57% to a $940.0M request in FY2027, sustained across the five-year plan. In the FY2027 defense authorization, the House funded it in full; the Senate funded it in full; House appropriators cut 2.9% (to $912.6M). Lockheed Martin leads the industry work.

FY2027 Request
$940.0M
▲ 57% vs FY2026
House approps mark
$912.6M
▼ $27.4M vs request
FY2026 Enacted
$597.4M
In law

Roll-up of 5 projects. Projects are the summable leaves — the PE total is their sum, never added to it.

For fiscal year 2027, Defense-Wide agencies are requesting $940.0M for Ballistic Missile Defense Command and Control, Battle Management & Communication under RDT&E program element 0603896C, up 57% over FY2026. In the FY2027 defense authorization, House approps moved to cut it to $912.6M.

Funding trajectory

Funding profile, FY2025–FY2031

Prior years are actuals, the budget year is the request, and the outyears are the FYDP plan. Estimate types are colored and never summed into one figure.

4008001,2000567.6FY25ACTUAL597.4FY26ENACTED940.0FY27REQUEST1,348.3FY281,241.6FY291,264.2FY301,194.9FY31HOUSE APPROPS
Actual Enacted Request Outyear (FYDP) House approps mark
Fiscal YearEstimate TypeAmount ($M)
FY2025Actual567.6
FY2026Enacted597.4
FY2027Request940.0
FY2028Outyear1,348.3
FY2029Outyear1,241.6
FY2030Outyear1,264.2
FY2031Outyear1,194.9
Where it sits

Acquisition lifecycle

This program is funded in RDT&E Budget Activity 4 — Advanced Component Development & Prototypes.

Complete
Research
BA 1–2
Complete
Advanced Technology
BA 3
Current
Prototyping
BA 4
Later
Development & Fielding
BA 5–7
Inside the program element

5 projects roll up into PE 0603896C

Projects are the summable leaves — the PE total is their sum, never added to it. Program elements and projects carry the full five-year plan; activities stop at the budget year. This PE moves 57% overall, which can hide much larger swings below.

Congressional action

The request is contested

Committee marks on the FY2027 request. Adds and cuts are reconciled in conference before they become law.

RequestPresident's Budget
$940.0M
House NDAA (HASC)HASC
$940.0M full · +$0
Senate NDAA (SASC)SASC
$940.0M full · +$0
House Approps (HAC-D)HAC_D
$912.6M −$27.4M · −2.9%
▲ $27.4M chamber gap — unresolved as of 2026-07-27. These are FY2027 authorization marks (NDAA); appropriations and the conference agreement may differ.
Who's building it

Where the FY2027 request goes

Performers named in the R-3 exhibit, resolved into industry, government-lab, and unspecified shares. Budget-justification contract funding, not obligations.

Lockheed Martin
$412.4M · 44%
C2BMC Development and Deployment - C2BMC Hardware/Software Development, Integration & Test (I&T) · CPIF
JACOBS
$60.1M · 6.4%
C2BMC Development and Deployment - Joint Early Warning Lab (JEWL) and C2BMC Lab Build Out · CPAF
Where FY2027 funding flowsShare$M
Industry primes58%548.2
Government labs & warfare centers19%180.7
Other / unspecified22%211.0
FY2027 request100%940.0
See Lockheed Martin's full federal contract ledger members
Program detail

Mission & acquisition strategy

The funds requested in this PE provide both legacy and Global Missile Defense Capability development for the United States, its deployed forces, allies, and partners. The capabilities funded by this budget request are complementary to the architecture funded by the Golden Dome Program's separate budget request and together fulfill the President's Executive Order 14186. The President's January 27, 2025, Executive Order established a goal of protecting the U.S. citizens, safeguarding critical infrastructure, and securing second-strike capability against missile attack from any adversary.

A sole source C2BMC contract to Lockheed Martin was awarded 1st quarter FY 2012. The current ordering period is through 4th quarter FY 2026. Major team members to Lockheed are Northrop Grumman, Boeing, Raytheon, and General Dynamics. They are charged with the systems engineering, M&S, development, testing, fielding, and cybersecurity development support of the C2BMC system. The sole source C2BMC Follow-on contract was awarded in 3rd quarter FY 2024 to continue support of the C2BMC system. Additionally, other government agencies provide support to include DISA for C2BMC worldwide long-haul communications and various performers for M&S and independent verification and validation.

Project MD01, MX01, MT01, MD40, MC01 — Command & Control, Battle Management, Communications (C2BMC)
  • Product Development
  • Support
  • Management Services
Ask Hitch

Ask this program element

Answers are generated from the figures on this page — the FY2027 justification exhibits and the marks tracked above — and nothing else is consulted. Confirm any figure against the cited exhibit before you use it externally.

H
Questions this page can answer
How does the FY2027 request compare with FY2026, and what does the five-year plan show?What did House approps do to this request, and what is still unresolved?Which project inside PE 0603896C is growing fastest, and which is shrinking?How is the FY2027 request split between industry and government performers?

This page carries the budget justification and the NDAA marks — nothing else. For what Lockheed Martin has actually been obligated, the ledger is at hitchintel.com/vendors; for live solicitations, hitchintel.com/opportunities. Both are member surfaces.

Provenance

Cite this page

Sources
FY2027 Office of the Secretary of Defense RDT&E Budget Justification · Exhibits R-2 / R-3 · PE 0603896C (President's Budget PB2027) — and FY2027 NDAA committee marks, as tracked 2026-07-27.
Suggested citation
HitchAI, "Ballistic Missile Defense Command and Control, Battle Management & Communication (PE 0603896C)," federal budget intelligence, PB2027 vintage. hitchintel.com/programs/0603896C
Machine access
Markdown twin /programs/0603896C.md · MCP mcp.hitchintel.combudget_get_program_element, budget_get_cong_marks
FY2027 Request
$687.0M
▲ 94% vs FY2026
FY2026 Enacted
$353.6M
▲ 6.2% vs FY2025
FY2025 Actual
$333.0M
Prior year

Command & Control, Battle Management, Communications (C2BMC) — one RDT&E project inside PE 0603896C. Congressional marks are recorded on the program element, not on a project.

Project MD01 — Command & Control, Battle Management, Communications (C2BMC) — requests $687.0M in FY2027, 73% of the $940.0M requested for program element 0603896C. Year over year it grows 94% against FY2026.

Funding trajectory

Project MD01 funding, FY2025–FY2031

Prior years are actuals, the budget year is the request, and the outyears are the FYDP plan. Estimate types are colored and never summed into one figure. Projects carry the full five-year plan; the activities inside them stop at the budget year.

2505007501,0000333.0FY25ACTUAL353.6FY26ENACTED687.0FY27REQUEST1,086.8FY28973.4FY29989.6FY30920.7FY31
Actual Enacted Request Outyear (FYDP)
Fiscal YearEstimate TypeAmount ($M)
FY2025Actual333.0
FY2026Enacted353.6
FY2027Request687.0
FY2028Outyear1,086.8
FY2029Outyear973.4
FY2030Outyear989.6
FY2031Outyear920.7
Inside the project

4 accomplishments / planned programs

The R-2A exhibit. Activities carry the prior, current and budget year only — no five-year plan — and they are descriptive: coverage is partial and they do not always add back to the project, so count them, never total them. Opening lines only here — the full year-by-year narrative is on the project page.

FY2025 actual$271.1M
FY2026 enacted$289.2M
FY2027 request$547.8M

- Continue integration and analysis with PWSA, MEO Track Custody, Geosynchronous Earth Orbit (GEO) Wide Field of View (WFOV) into experimental laboratories in support of risk reduction towards integration into the BOA software. - Deliver BOA software to operationalize updated raid performance to improve system throughput in mass raids…

Read the FY2027 plan →
C2BMC Communications▲ 20%
FY2025 actual$24.5M
FY2026 enacted$22.6M
FY2027 request$27.1M

- Procure Generation II modems to support current operational Missile Defense Assets.

FY2025 actual$37.5M
FY2026 enacted$41.8M
FY2027 request$65.1M

- Installation of the resilient network communications infrastructure for the Guam Defense System Early Operational Capability, including secure fiber optic and Defense Red Switch Network connectivity to Missile Defense System sites. - Develop and purchase Knowledge Wall equipment for integration into the Guam Command Center. - Develop…

Read the FY2027 plan →
FY2025 actual$0.0M
FY2026 enacted$0.0M
FY2027 request$47.0M

- Advance the Integration of evolutionary JTMC-Bridge development for Missile Defense System-Next capability architectures. - Continue JTIFC acceleration efforts for Combat Identification (ID) / distributed JMAC (JTMC-B v2.0), Engagement Coordination ABMAs (JTMC Bridge v3.0) and EP (JTMC Bridge v4.0.) - Develop and approve JTMC Bridge…

Read the FY2027 plan →
Project MD01 — every activity in full →
Who's building it

Named performers on project MD01

Performers named in the R-3 exhibit under this project. Share is of the project's whole FY2027 R-3 total — the same denominator the program-element split uses, so the two read on one scale and will not sum to 100% when unnamed or government work is in the mix. Budget-justification contract funding, not obligations.

Lockheed Martin
$277.1M · 40%
Northrop Grumman
$30.1M · 4.4%
JACOBS
$27.7M · 4.0%
Mobius Consulting
$4.5M · 0.7%
Project detail

What project MD01 buys

The funds requested in this PE provide both legacy and Global Missile Defense Capability development for the United States, its deployed forces, allies, and partners. The capabilities funded by this budget request are complementary to the architecture funded by the Golden Dome Program's separate budget request and together fulfill the President's Executive Order 14186. The President's January 27, 2025, Executive Order established a goal of protecting the U.S. citizens, safeguarding critical infrastructure, and securing second-strike capability against missile attack from any adversary. This program and budget in addition to the budget requested by the Golden Dome Program Office reflects the changes necessary to protect the U.S. against ballistic, hypersonic, cruise, and other advanced missile threats. C2BMC provides incremental development, deployment, and operational support of C2BMC capabilities required for Missile Defense System planning, situational awareness, sensor management, and engagement coordination. As the integrating element of the Missile Defense System, the C2BMC Program of Record is foundational to all future development and supports annual capability deliveries to support Missile Defense System-Next. C2BMC delivers capabilities incrementally with each software build (named as a Spiral or Capability Build), adding to or enhancing the capability of the previous build. C2BMC incremental delivery of Spiral 8.2 provides critical Homeland Defense for increased Ground-based Midcourse Defense (GMD) battlespace, improved threat tracking using multiple sensors communicating via Link-16, enhanced sensor tasking to meet track quality and discrimination timeliness requirements, Space Domain Awareness (SDA) tasking support, and improved cyber capabilities. Enhanced Homeland Defense also integrates the Ballistic Missile Defense System Overhead Persistent Infrared (OPIR) Architecture (BOA) with the Missile Defense System to enhance system level missile-tracking capabilities through earlier cueing of radars and weapon systems.

R-3 lines of work
  • Product Development
  • Support
  • Management Services
FY2027 Request
$144.9M
▲ 3.0% vs FY2026
FY2026 Enacted
$140.6M
▲ 0.7% vs FY2025
FY2025 Actual
$139.6M
Prior year

Command & Control, Battle Management, Communications (C2BMC) Development Support — one RDT&E project inside PE 0603896C. Congressional marks are recorded on the program element, not on a project.

Project MX01 — Command & Control, Battle Management, Communications (C2BMC) Development Support — requests $144.9M in FY2027, 15% of the $940.0M requested for program element 0603896C. Year over year it grows 3.0% against FY2026.

Funding trajectory

Project MX01 funding, FY2025–FY2031

Prior years are actuals, the budget year is the request, and the outyears are the FYDP plan. Estimate types are colored and never summed into one figure. Projects carry the full five-year plan; the activities inside them stop at the budget year.

501001500139.6FY25ACTUAL140.6FY26ENACTED144.9FY27REQUEST147.8FY28150.7FY29151.2FY30151.2FY31
Actual Enacted Request Outyear (FYDP)
Fiscal YearEstimate TypeAmount ($M)
FY2025Actual139.6
FY2026Enacted140.6
FY2027Request144.9
FY2028Outyear147.8
FY2029Outyear150.7
FY2030Outyear151.2
FY2031Outyear151.2
Inside the project

2 accomplishments / planned programs

The R-2A exhibit. Activities carry the prior, current and budget year only — no five-year plan — and they are descriptive: coverage is partial and they do not always add back to the project, so count them, never total them. Opening lines only here — the full year-by-year narrative is on the project page.

Operations Engineering▲ 1%
FY2025 actual$121.4M
FY2026 enacted$122.9M
FY2027 request$124.4M

The exhibit describes this work once, for project MX01 as a whole, rather than per activity. Read the project justification →

Concurrent Test, Training, and Operations (CTTO)▲ 16%
FY2025 actual$18.2M
FY2026 enacted$17.7M
FY2027 request$20.5M

Increase from FY 2026 to FY 2027 provides for the re-architecture of C2BMC Planning software for cyber compliance and rapid defense design analysis and updates. This provides the Warfighter the capability to rapidly update battle plans for emerging threats and changes in sensor access/performance.

Project MX01 — every activity in full →
Who's building it

Named performers on project MX01

Performers named in the R-3 exhibit under this project. Share is of the project's whole FY2027 R-3 total — the same denominator the program-element split uses, so the two read on one scale and will not sum to 100% when unnamed or government work is in the mix. Budget-justification contract funding, not obligations.

Lockheed Martin
$112.9M · 78%
SONALYSTS
$5.2M · 3.6%
Northrop Grumman
$2.1M · 1.5%
MANTECH
$1.7M · 1.2%
Project detail

What project MX01 buys

Command and Control, Battle Management and Communications (C2BMC) Development Support provides operations engineering, integrated logistics, warfighter integration, deployment, and disposal of the current operational system and/or systems fielded in United States Strategic Command, United States Northern Command (USNORTHCOM), United States Indo-Pacific Command (USINDOPACOM), United States European Command (USEUCOM), United States Central Command (USCENTCOM), and U.S. Space Command (USSPACECOM) and the operation of the C2BMC Control Center. This activity provides continuous support of the development, deployment, sustainment of the C2BMC training systems, and updates training material to stay current with fielded capabilities.

R-3 lines of work
  • Product Development
  • Management Services
FY2027 Request
$63.9M
▲ 6.9% vs FY2026
FY2026 Enacted
$59.7M
▲ 5.1% vs FY2025
FY2025 Actual
$56.9M
Prior year

C2BMC Test — one RDT&E project inside PE 0603896C. Congressional marks are recorded on the program element, not on a project.

Project MT01 — C2BMC Test — requests $63.9M in FY2027, 6.8% of the $940.0M requested for program element 0603896C. Year over year it grows 6.9% against FY2026.

Funding trajectory

Project MT01 funding, FY2025–FY2031

Prior years are actuals, the budget year is the request, and the outyears are the FYDP plan. Estimate types are colored and never summed into one figure. Projects carry the full five-year plan; the activities inside them stop at the budget year.

2550056.9FY25ACTUAL59.7FY26ENACTED63.9FY27REQUEST63.3FY2864.6FY2964.8FY3064.8FY31
Actual Enacted Request Outyear (FYDP)
Fiscal YearEstimate TypeAmount ($M)
FY2025Actual56.9
FY2026Enacted59.7
FY2027Request63.9
FY2028Outyear63.3
FY2029Outyear64.6
FY2030Outyear64.8
FY2031Outyear64.8
Inside the project

1 accomplishment / planned program

The R-2A exhibit. Activities carry the prior, current and budget year only — no five-year plan — and they are descriptive: coverage is partial and they do not always add back to the project, so count them, never total them. Opening lines only here — the full year-by-year narrative is on the project page.

FY2025 actual$56.9M
FY2026 enacted$59.7M
FY2027 request$63.9M

-Participate in ground test events to support fielding of C2BMC and BOA Ballistic Missile Defense System Track (BST) with System Level Integrated Discrimination (SLD) by testing the following capabilities: Generation BST with SLD to support GMD Engagements, BOA Integration, SDA refinement, Reporting of Space Object Catalog entities to…

Open this activity →
Project MT01 — every activity in full →
Who's building it

Named performers on project MT01

Performers named in the R-3 exhibit under this project. Share is of the project's whole FY2027 R-3 total — the same denominator the program-element split uses, so the two read on one scale and will not sum to 100% when unnamed or government work is in the mix. Budget-justification contract funding, not obligations.

JACOBS
$31.1M · 49%
Northrop Grumman
$16.0M · 25%
Lockheed Martin
$15.7M · 25%
Project detail

What project MT01 buys

Command and Control, Battle Management and Communications (C2BMC) Test supports system flight and ground testing, wargames, and exercises as detailed in the Missile Defense Agency (MDA) Integrated Master Test Plan (IMTP) to ensure C2BMC capabilities delivered are consistent with the Prioritized Capabilities List and are interoperable with other Missile Defense System components. MDA gains efficiencies and minimizes laboratory resource requirements (footprint, personnel, and hardware) by utilizing the C2BMC Test Facility and the Persistent Infrared Testbed (PIT), formerly Overhead Persistent InfraRed Capabilities Lab (OCL), test infrastructure as the laboratory environment supporting System Test, Development, and Sustainment. For System Ground and Flight Test, the labs are used for pre-test analysis, test execution, and post-test analysis. For Development, the labs are utilized for software verification and validation testing and system integration testing. For Sustainment, the labs are used to assist with root cause determination for issues discovered on the fielded system and validation of any required software patches.

R-3 lines of work
  • Test and Evaluation
FY2027 Request
$35.9M
▲ 2.0% vs FY2026
FY2026 Enacted
$35.2M
▲ 17% vs FY2025
FY2025 Actual
$30.0M
Prior year

Program-Wide Support — one RDT&E project inside PE 0603896C. Congressional marks are recorded on the program element, not on a project.

Project MD40 — Program-Wide Support — requests $35.9M in FY2027, 3.8% of the $940.0M requested for program element 0603896C. Year over year it grows 2.0% against FY2026.

Funding trajectory

Project MD40 funding, FY2025–FY2031

Prior years are actuals, the budget year is the request, and the outyears are the FYDP plan. Estimate types are colored and never summed into one figure. Projects carry the full five-year plan; the activities inside them stop at the budget year.

2550030.0FY25ACTUAL35.2FY26ENACTED35.9FY27REQUEST41.8FY2844.2FY2949.9FY3049.5FY31
Actual Enacted Request Outyear (FYDP)
Fiscal YearEstimate TypeAmount ($M)
FY2025Actual30.0
FY2026Enacted35.2
FY2027Request35.9
FY2028Outyear41.8
FY2029Outyear44.2
FY2030Outyear49.9
FY2031Outyear49.5
Inside the project

1 accomplishment / planned program

The R-2A exhibit. Activities carry the prior, current and budget year only — no five-year plan — and they are descriptive: coverage is partial and they do not always add back to the project, so count them, never total them. Opening lines only here — the full year-by-year narrative is on the project page.

Program Wide Support▲ 2%
FY2025 actual$30.0M
FY2026 enacted$35.2M
FY2027 request$35.9M

- Increase from FY 2026 to FY 2027 reflects the PWS allocation on a pro-rata basis across multiple Agency PE's each FY based on the total Agency budget and, therefore, fluctuates per PE by FY.

Project MD40 — every activity in full →
Who's building it

Named performers on project MD40

Performers named in the R-3 exhibit under this project. Share is of the project's whole FY2027 R-3 total — the same denominator the program-element split uses, so the two read on one scale and will not sum to 100% when unnamed or government work is in the mix. Budget-justification contract funding, not obligations.

Veterans
$8.5M · 24%
Project detail

What project MD40 buys

PWS contains non-headquarters management costs in support of Missile Defense Agency (MDA) functions and activities across the entire Missile Defense System. These functions include Government Civilians and Contract Support Services. This effort provides integrity and oversight of the Missile Defense System as well as supports MDA in the development and evaluation of technologies that will respond to the changing threat. Additionally, PWS includes personnel to support global deployments performing deployment site preparation and activation, and provides facility capabilities for MDA Executing Agent locations worldwide. Other MDA wide costs include: physical and technical security; civilian drug testing; audit readiness; the Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) program; legal services and settlements; travel and agency training; office, equipment, vehicle, and warehouse leases; utilities and base operations across multiple geographic locations; commercial and ancillary facility services; management of all facility aspects regardless of lifecycle stage; supplies and maintenance; compliance with statutory environmental requirements; data and unified communications support; materiel and readiness and central property management of equipment; Facilities Sustainment, Restoration and Modernization (FSRM) program (formerly Real Property Maintenance) to keep the Department's inventory of facilities in good working order; and similar operating expenses. PWS is allocated on a pro-rata basis across most Agency PEs and, therefore, fluctuates per PE by FY based on the total Agency budget in that FY.

R-3 lines of work
  • Support
  • Management Services
FY2027 Request
$8.4M
▲ 2.3% vs FY2026
FY2026 Enacted
$8.2M
▲ 0.3% vs FY2025
FY2025 Actual
$8.2M
Prior year

Cyber Operations — one RDT&E project inside PE 0603896C. Congressional marks are recorded on the program element, not on a project.

Project MC01 — Cyber Operations — requests $8.4M in FY2027, 0.9% of the $940.0M requested for program element 0603896C. Year over year it grows 2.3% against FY2026.

Funding trajectory

Project MC01 funding, FY2025–FY2031

Prior years are actuals, the budget year is the request, and the outyears are the FYDP plan. Estimate types are colored and never summed into one figure. Projects carry the full five-year plan; the activities inside them stop at the budget year.

08.2FY25ACTUAL8.2FY26ENACTED8.4FY27REQUEST8.5FY288.7FY298.7FY308.8FY31
Actual Enacted Request Outyear (FYDP)
Fiscal YearEstimate TypeAmount ($M)
FY2025Actual8.2
FY2026Enacted8.2
FY2027Request8.4
FY2028Outyear8.5
FY2029Outyear8.7
FY2030Outyear8.7
FY2031Outyear8.8
Inside the project

1 accomplishment / planned program

The R-2A exhibit. Activities carry the prior, current and budget year only — no five-year plan — and they are descriptive: coverage is partial and they do not always add back to the project, so count them, never total them.

Network / System Certification and Accreditation (C&A)▲ 2%
FY2025 actual$8.2M
FY2026 enacted$8.2M
FY2027 request$8.4M

The exhibit describes this work once, for project MC01 as a whole, rather than per activity. Read the project justification →

Who's building it

Named performers on project MC01

Performers named in the R-3 exhibit under this project. Share is of the project's whole FY2027 R-3 total — the same denominator the program-element split uses, so the two read on one scale and will not sum to 100% when unnamed or government work is in the mix. Budget-justification contract funding, not obligations.

Lockheed Martin
$6.8M · 81%
Project detail

What project MC01 buys

Command and Control, Battle Management & Communication (C2BMC) Cyber Operations sustain the Missile Defense Agency (MDA) Risk Management Framework (RMF) and Security Controls Assessments/Controls Validation Testing activities, analysis of validation results, risk assessments, and reviews of proposed Program Manager/Information System Security Manager Plan of Action and Milestones (POA&Ms) and Cybersecurity Tools for MDA C2BMC mission systems. Activities in this Project are necessary to comply with the Federal Information Systems Modernization Act.

R-3 lines of work
  • Product Development
  • Support
  • Management Services